Shyon
10-23
The government’s renewed push into quantum computing is intriguing, especially given Trump’s track record of boosting sectors he backs. If stakes in $IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$ or $Rigetti Computing(RGTI)$ happen, it could add funding and legitimacy to a still-nascent field. But I’m cautious — most quantum firms remain unprofitable, and recent rallies look more speculative than sustainable.

I prefer exposure through big tech names like $Microsoft(MSFT)$ , $IBM(IBM)$ , or $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ . They’re advancing quantum research while staying profitable in AI and cloud, offering far more stability than pure-play firms. Still, government involvement could accelerate real progress faster than expected.

In the long run, quantum computing could reshape industries from cybersecurity to drug discovery, though the shift will be slow. It’s on my radar, not my core portfolio — but if Trump’s “golden touch” strikes again, I might take a small speculative bet.

@Tiger_comments @TigerStars

Quantum Move! Is This the Next “Rare Earth” Boom?
Several quantum-computing companies are in talks to give the Commerce Department equity stakes in exchange for federal funding, a signal that the Trump administration is expanding its interventions in what it sees as critical segments of the economy. IonQ and D-Wave Quantum rose 17%; Rigetti Computing rose 14%; Quantum Computing and Sealsq rose 10%; Arqit Quantum rose 24%.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

Leave a comment
3
20