To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
Khoo18
+Follow
Posts · 607
Posts · 607
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2024-06-27
$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$
看
4.12K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-16
K
72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape
Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer m
72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape
看
4.47K
回复
Comment
点赞
15
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-15
K
Chinese Education ADRs Plummetted in Morning Trading; TAL Education Dropped 20%
Chinese education ADRs plummetted in morning trading . Gaotu Techedu dropped 18%; New Oriental Educa
Chinese Education ADRs Plummetted in Morning Trading; TAL Education Dropped 20%
看
3.58K
回复
Comment
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-14
K
Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge
Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet
Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge
看
3.96K
回复
Comment
点赞
7
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-13
K
20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB
SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big l
20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB
看
4.14K
回复
Comment
点赞
10
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-12
K
Jobs Report, Bank Failure Complicate Outlook on Interest Rates
Fed officials could debate whether to raise rates by a quarter- or half-percentage-point at their next meeting
Jobs Report, Bank Failure Complicate Outlook on Interest Rates
看
4.46K
回复
Comment
点赞
8
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-11
K
2 Stocks That Turned $10,000 Into $24,000 (or More)
Consumer staples stocks aren't exciting, but they are reliable. And given enough time, that can easily double your money.
2 Stocks That Turned $10,000 Into $24,000 (or More)
看
3.85K
回复
Comment
点赞
8
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-10
K
2 Exceptional Growth Stocks That Could Jump 37.6% to 40.2% Higher, According to Wall Street
These businesses are at the top of their respective industries, but you wouldn't know it by looking at their stock prices.
2 Exceptional Growth Stocks That Could Jump 37.6% to 40.2% Higher, According to Wall Street
看
3.73K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-09
K
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
4.04K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Khoo18
Khoo18
·
2023-03-08
K
Silvergate Is in Talks With FDIC Officials on Ways to Salvage Bank
Examiners have been on the ground since last week, people saidA decision on Silvergate’s future hasn
Silvergate Is in Talks With FDIC Officials on Ways to Salvage Bank
看
3.98K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586514899418238","uuid":"3586514899418238","gmtCreate":1623426973024,"gmtModify":1624678784844,"name":"Khoo18","pinyin":"khoo18","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":61,"headSize":475,"tweetSize":607,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.07.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.22","exceedPercentage":"93.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.40%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":321167738748952,"gmtCreate":1719440995045,"gmtModify":1719987601755,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$ </a> ","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$ </a> ","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321167738748952","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4117,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949725923,"gmtCreate":1678916382962,"gmtModify":1678916386591,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":15,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949725923","repostId":"1123603567","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123603567","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678891090,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123603567?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-15 22:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123603567","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer m","content":"<div>\n<p>Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-15 22:38 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBNY":"签字银行","PACW":"西太平洋合众银行","WAL":"阿莱恩斯西部银行"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123603567","content_text":"Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California. The news was bad—and getting worse. Everyone from President Joe Biden on down was getting acrash courseonSilicon Valley Bank, the once-obscure tech lender that has now cast abig shadow over the financial markets.At the White House and the US Department of the Treasury next door, bleary-eyed officials were racing to prevent the trouble at SVB from exploding into a full-blown banking crisis. A block west at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., regulators were arguing about what to do. Over at the Gridiron Club dinner, Washington’s annual see-and-be-seen white-tie journalism roast, a marquee guest, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, was conspicuously absent.That Saturday, March 11, the fate of techdom’s preeminent bank—and with it, some feared, the future of the global economy—was being gamed out in Washington. Over the next 24 hours, almost everyone in the financial industry would be on tenterhooks as federal officials raced to complete a rescue before Asian markets opened Sunday night.Almost a week later, the implications of the SVB fiasco, thesecond-biggest bank failure in US history, are still coming into focus. Questions keep piling up. How could SVB, a favorite of venture capitalists and unicorn startups, succumb to arun in the smartphone age? Why hadn’t banking regulators seen this coming?Federal authorities want answers, too. The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission haveopened investigationsinto the collapse. One potential focus:sales of SVB stockin the weeks before the failure by Greg Becker, chief executive officer of the bank’s parent company. Biden, meanwhile, has pledged a push totighten banking rules, which the Fed is already considering doing for midsize institutions like SVB.This much is sure: All these years later, Washington is still haunted by the Wall Street fiascoes that triggered the Great Recession. The colossal bank bailouts of that era saved the economy, but they also rankled ordinary Americans, gave birth to the Tea Party movement on the right and Occupy Wall Street on the left, and transformed US politics. Backlash to the bailouts died down, but the resentment never really went away. It may have ultimately helped Donald Trump win the White House in 2016, some political scientists havesaid.Which is probably why President Biden has been reluctant to even say the word “bailout.” He vowed on March 13 that “no losses will be borne by the taxpayers.” For the time being, Biden is right. This doesn’t look like aLehman momentthat could upend the whole economy. But itdoeslook likea Bear Stearns one—a smaller debacle pointing to more pain to come, in this case, because of the sharp rise in interest rates that triggered SVB’s problems and are still roiling the financial system.Federal authorities have taken the extraordinary step ofguaranteeing all deposits at SVBand opening a broaderemergency lending program. By midweek, the fix was holding. If it doesn’t, the next move might have to be a suspension of the$250,000 limit on federal deposit insurance.Policymakers, venture capitalists, banking executives and tech entrepreneurs are all struggling to figure out the next steps. SVB’s failure has changed the conversation about banking and the regulators who oversee it. Suddenly, everyone is thinking about other risks that might be lurking. On March 14,Moody’s Investors Service cut its outlook for the entire US banking system, to negative from stable, citing the run on deposits at SVB. Two other lenders have gone bust, too: crypto playersSilvergate Capital Corp.andSignature Bank.The death spiral at SVB began with credit ratings. In early March, Moody’s informed the bank it was considering a multilevel downgrade that would have pushed it to the brink of junk-bond status. In response, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., hired by SVB to help it raise fresh capital, jumped into action. It offloaded a chunk of SVB’s investment portfolio at a $1.8 billion loss. On Wednesday, March 8, Goldman pitched a plan to investors to help plug that hole, and then some, by raising $2.25 billion in capital fromGeneral Atlanticand other investors. Itdidn’t work.“The Catch-22 of the situation is that, by announcing the need to raise capital, they in essence accelerated customer concern, resulting in the liquidity stress that ultimately caused their collapse,” says Olivier Sarkozy, managing partner atFurther Global, a private equity firm. “It would have been far better to announce the $2.25 billion they were seeking had been secured.”In the bankers’ view, they were racing the clock to defuse the Moody’s threat. That didn’t leave them enough time to canvass the market, line up the funding and present a neatly put-together deal. Then CEO Becker held what turned out to be a disastrous call with VCs and limited partners. “Stay calm,” he said. It was too late. Bankers tapping away at their phones watched, aghast, as social media lit up with reports of a viral bank run.By 3 p.m. the next day, Thursday, March 9, the news out of Santa Clarahad reached the White House. Such high-profile venture firms asUnion Square Venturesand thePeter Thiel-backedFounders Fundhad already been encouraging the companies they invested in to yank their deposits, almost all of which were uninsured because they exceeded the $250,000 limit on federal guarantees. Founders Fund haddrained its own accountsfrom the bank by midday.The message was echoed by other VC titans.Bookface, an internal social network for founders of companies backed by the startup acceleratorY Combinator, was abuzz, as was a messenger threadof more than 1,000 founders fromAndreessen Horowitz, with many encouraging each other to pull cash from the bank. By day’s end, depositors had tried to withdraw $42 billion.Silicon Valley bigs—many with a libertarian, get-government-off-our-backs bent—quickly looked to Washington. They implored the administration to step in and rescue depositors, or risk having banks topple like dominoes. On Friday morning, March 10, the new White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients and Lael Brainard, the former Fed vice chair who’djust becomedirector of Biden’s National Economic Council, went to the Oval Office to brief the president. They told him there was potential for the bank to be shut down—as it was later that day, even before the close of financial markets—and that there was a possibility of contagion, according to a source familiar with the discussion.From dawn to midnight the following day, Zients, Brainard and other aides working in the White House’s West Wing developed a set of options. By Saturday afternoon, it was clear that regulators would probably need to take action to prevent contagion. When Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and top aides briefed Biden on the options, he was adamant: The federal government stood ready to protect depositors, small businesses and employees. Executives and investors could take their lumps. He didn’t want taxpayers to be on the hook, and any deal had to include firing management.In the Bay Area, Iba Masood was struggling to make sense of it all. Masood, the co-founder and CEO of a tech startup calledTara.AI, had raised $14 million from investors. And she’d parked every penny of the company’s money at SVB. Masood began firing off emails and texts—hundreds and hundreds of them, until her carpal tunnel flared up. Tara.AI, she told her investors, was facing a perilous squeeze. She hopped in her C300 Mercedes-Benz and raced through a driving rainstorm to a Bank of America branch. Drenched, she hastily opened a corporate account. She felt good, she said, confident. She’d wake up the next morning and have the money in the new account.But there was no next morning for SVB. It was too late. The money was frozen.Trae Stephens, a partner at Founders Fund, said the firm had had a long, fruitful relationship with SVB. But that long, fruitful relationship wasn’t going to help Thiel’s firm honor its fiduciary duty to look out for its backers and limited partners. And it wasn’t going to help all those startups make payroll.“The most inconvenient thing about the situation last week was actually the name of the bank. It got instantly politicized,” Stephens said in aMarch 14 interview on Bloomberg Television. To him, the idea that Washington had somehow bailed out rich VCs and techies is hogwash. “The government did what it needed to protect and shore up these smaller regional banks, to ensure there weren’t any further runs. It seems like they acted quickly—and did the right thing.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBNY":0.9,"WAL":0.9,"SIVB":0.9,"PACW":0.9,"FRC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4467,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949461192,"gmtCreate":1678835670816,"gmtModify":1678835674654,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949461192","repostId":"1118774944","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118774944","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1678802888,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118774944?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-14 22:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Chinese Education ADRs Plummetted in Morning Trading; TAL Education Dropped 20%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118774944","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Chinese education ADRs plummetted in morning trading . Gaotu Techedu dropped 18%; New Oriental Educa","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Chinese education ADRs plummetted in morning trading . Gaotu Techedu dropped 18%; New Oriental Education & Technology dropped 14%; TAL Education dropped 20%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a73c47636af1510c438d848ca7f7c87\" tg-width=\"279\" tg-height=\"136\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chinese Education ADRs Plummetted in Morning Trading; TAL Education Dropped 20%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChinese Education ADRs Plummetted in Morning Trading; TAL Education Dropped 20%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-14 22:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Chinese education ADRs plummetted in morning trading . Gaotu Techedu dropped 18%; New Oriental Education & Technology dropped 14%; TAL Education dropped 20%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a73c47636af1510c438d848ca7f7c87\" tg-width=\"279\" tg-height=\"136\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EDU":"新东方","TAL":"好未来","GOTU":"高途"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118774944","content_text":"Chinese education ADRs plummetted in morning trading . Gaotu Techedu dropped 18%; New Oriental Education & Technology dropped 14%; TAL Education dropped 20%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"EDU":0.9,"GOTU":0.9,"TAL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3582,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949534240,"gmtCreate":1678745305481,"gmtModify":1678745308871,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949534240","repostId":"1105902626","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105902626","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678717774,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105902626?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-13 22:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105902626","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet","content":"<div>\n<p>Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTraders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-13 22:29 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBNY":"签字银行"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105902626","content_text":"Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now show a less than one-in-two chance that the Federal Reserve will implement another quarter-point hike this cycle. Yields on two-year Treasury notes — the most sensitive to changes in policy — fell as much as 60 basis points to less than 3.99%, the lowest since October.The three-month London interbank offered rate for dollars, a key benchmark, dropped by 27 basis points, the most since March 2020. The dollar also declined.Money markets are betting the Federal Reserve is probably done with hiking this cycle. Traders are now pricing a less than one-in two chance the Fed will hike by another quarter point at all this cycle, with cuts after that.It’s the latest abrupt change in the stop-start trajectory in recent months for further interest-rate hikes, as traders factor in the risk of banking contagion alongside the prospects for growth and prices. Some analysts warn the outlook may shift again if US inflation data due Tuesday beats expectations, although the immediate fragility of the financial system may well overshadow matters.“Mr Market always want to search out the weak link,” said Jack McIntyre, a portfolio manager at Brandywine. “The data is not as important as what is going on with the financial system. Just have to let the dust settle and see how CPI plays out.”Treasuries have beenwhipsawedin recent sessions by the evolving rate-hike outlook. Two-year US yields slid in the past few days after jumping above 5% last week when Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank was likely to liftinterest rateshigher and potentially faster than previously anticipated with inflation persisting.That view of Powell’s may change after the failure of three lenders in recent days, including Silicon Valley Bank, highlighted the fallout from higher interest rates. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. hasscrappedits call for a rate hike at next week’s Fed meeting, although it still sees tightening this year.“We have to add one more factor to Fed policymakers’ thinking, which is the burden on the financial system,” said Kenta Inoue, a senior bond strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co. in Tokyo. “It’s become quite difficult for them to opt for a 50-basis point hike. SVB’s collapse has increased the probability that the end of the Fed’s rate hikes isn’t too far off now.”The impact of the banks’ collapse also triggered shock waves around the world, with German and Japanese yields plunging.Traders are now watching for further responses from policymakers. The Fed set up a new emergency facility to let banks pledge a range of high-quality assets for cash over a term of one year, in the wake of SVB’s collapse. Regulators also pledged to fully protect even uninsured depositors at the lender.SVB’s descent into FDIC receivership — the second-largest US bank failure in history behind Washington Mutual in 2008 — came suddenly on Friday, after a couple of days where its long-established customer base of tech startups yanked deposits.Still, concerns are growing that the failure of the three banks may just be the tip of the iceberg.“The risks are clearly there” that SVB’s collapse may be the canary in the coal mine, TD Securities strategists led by Priya Misra wrote in a research note on Sunday. “The macro fallout of SVB on the tech sector and bank lending standards as a whole should weigh on risk sentiment and longer term growth expectations.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SIVB":0.9,"SBNY":0.9,"FRC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3960,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949640522,"gmtCreate":1678655211967,"gmtModify":1678655215655,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949640522","repostId":"2318857796","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2318857796","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1678601805,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2318857796?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-12 14:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2318857796","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big l","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBO\">SVB Financial Group</a> faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cash</p><p>Silicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.</p><p>Trading of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBP\">SVB Financial Group</a>'s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">$(SIVB)$</a> stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was "monitoring very carefully." Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.</p><p>California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.</p><p>Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.</p><p>Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>First, a quick look at SVB</h3><p>Some media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.</p><p>One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because "client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted."</p><p>SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.</p><p>So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.</p><h3>Unrealized losses on securities</h3><p>Banks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.</p><p>The securities investments are held in two buckets:</p><p>In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.</p><p>Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: "Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments."</p><p>In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling "substantially all" of these securities on March 8.</p><p>The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trends</p><p>On the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.</p><p>Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12eb7c2420e69b60c526a6b6ef79626d\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.</p><p>To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capital</h3><p>There are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c786a5e88cfaa8510ac5458b4a31b86\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bbd38b51d92ae37f23e7fbff46e9c08\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"668\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMA\">Comerica Inc.</a>, which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.</p><p>But it is interesting to note that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital Corp.</a>, which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.</p><p>Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBNY\">Signature Bank</a> of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.</p><p>Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-12 14:16</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBO\">SVB Financial Group</a> faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cash</p><p>Silicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.</p><p>Trading of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBP\">SVB Financial Group</a>'s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">$(SIVB)$</a> stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was "monitoring very carefully." Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.</p><p>California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.</p><p>Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.</p><p>Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>First, a quick look at SVB</h3><p>Some media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.</p><p>One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because "client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted."</p><p>SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.</p><p>So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.</p><h3>Unrealized losses on securities</h3><p>Banks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.</p><p>The securities investments are held in two buckets:</p><p>In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.</p><p>Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: "Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments."</p><p>In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling "substantially all" of these securities on March 8.</p><p>The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trends</p><p>On the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.</p><p>Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12eb7c2420e69b60c526a6b6ef79626d\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.</p><p>To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capital</h3><p>There are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c786a5e88cfaa8510ac5458b4a31b86\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bbd38b51d92ae37f23e7fbff46e9c08\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"668\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMA\">Comerica Inc.</a>, which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.</p><p>But it is interesting to note that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital Corp.</a>, which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.</p><p>Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBNY\">Signature Bank</a> of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.</p><p>Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4007":"制药","LU0266013472.USD":"AXA WF - Framlington Longevity Economy A Cap USD","BK4211":"区域性银行","BK4539":"次新股","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","LU0390134368.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SBNY":"签字银行","BK4139":"生物科技","CRCT":"Cricut, Inc.","SI":"Shoulder Innovations, Inc.","TERN":"Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","KEY":"KeyCorp","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","BK4166":"消费信贷","BOLT":"Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.","ALLY":"Ally Financial Inc.","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","BK4191":"家用电器","BK4588":"碎股"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2318857796","content_text":"SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cashSilicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.Trading of SVB Financial Group's $(SIVB)$ stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was \"monitoring very carefully.\" Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.First, a quick look at SVBSome media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because \"client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted.\"SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.Unrealized losses on securitiesBanks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.The securities investments are held in two buckets:In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: \"Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments.\"In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling \"substantially all\" of these securities on March 8.The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trendsOn the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capitalThere are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact Comerica Inc., which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.But it is interesting to note that Silvergate Capital Corp., which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is Signature Bank of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SIVB":0.9,"FRC":0.9,"KEY":0.9,"SBNY":0.9,"BOLT":0.9,"ALLY":1,"TERN":0.9,"CRCT":0.9,"SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949638763,"gmtCreate":1678577235953,"gmtModify":1678577239714,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949638763","repostId":"1188991015","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188991015","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678524311,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188991015?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-11 16:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jobs Report, Bank Failure Complicate Outlook on Interest Rates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188991015","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Fed officials could debate whether to raise rates by a quarter- or half-percentage-point at their next meeting","content":"<div>\n<p>The February employment report does little to sharply alter the economic outlook for Federal Reserve officials who are considering how much to raise interest rates at their coming meeting.But the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/jobs-report-offers-little-to-change-interest-rate-outlook-for-the-fed-2b5bf1d4?mod=economy_lead_pos2\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"wsj_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jobs Report, Bank Failure Complicate Outlook on Interest Rates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJobs Report, Bank Failure Complicate Outlook on Interest Rates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-11 16:45 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/jobs-report-offers-little-to-change-interest-rate-outlook-for-the-fed-2b5bf1d4?mod=economy_lead_pos2><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The February employment report does little to sharply alter the economic outlook for Federal Reserve officials who are considering how much to raise interest rates at their coming meeting.But the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/jobs-report-offers-little-to-change-interest-rate-outlook-for-the-fed-2b5bf1d4?mod=economy_lead_pos2\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/jobs-report-offers-little-to-change-interest-rate-outlook-for-the-fed-2b5bf1d4?mod=economy_lead_pos2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188991015","content_text":"The February employment report does little to sharply alter the economic outlook for Federal Reserve officials who are considering how much to raise interest rates at their coming meeting.But the failure of a California bank on Friday led investors on Wall Street to pare their bets that the central bank would opt for a larger half-percentage-point increase, rather than a smaller quarter-point bump, amid broader concerns about financial stability risks.Investors in interest-rate futures markets on Friday afternoon saw a nearly 60% probability of a quarter-point, or 25-basis-point, rate rise, according to CME Group. The probability of a larger 50-basis-point increase fell to 40%, from 70% on Thursday.Employers added 311,000 jobs in February and revisions to earlier months were minor, meaning job gains averaged more than 350,000 a month since December—robust growth in an already tight labor market. The unemployment rate rose to 3.6% last month because more people looked for jobs, a further sign of economic strength.But wage growth moderated last month, suggesting that strong labor demand isn’t spurring rapid increases in workers’ paychecks. Average hourly earnings for private-sector workers rose 4.6% over the 12 months through February, but the pace slowed to an annualized 3.6% over the past three months.For policy makers, “if you are vacillating between 25 and 50, you’d be more inclined to go 25 at this point because of the added concern” over the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, said Eric Rosengren, who served as president of the Boston Fed from 2007 to 2021.Friday’s employment report shows the job market is too hot, said Mr. Rosengren. But the problems at Silicon Valley Bank illustrate how raising rates rapidly gives the Fed less time to monitor the delayed impact of its actions, he said.“Having a close to $200 billion bank have a liquidity problem that caused a failure in the middle of the week has to be a source of concern,” said Mr. Rosengren. Fed officials are “going to want to be able to evaluate what impact it is going to have on broader financial markets.”Fed policy makers were set to begin their traditional premeeting quiet period Saturday ahead of their March 21-22 meeting.Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said the central bank was keeping its options open in considering whether to raise its benchmark federal-funds rate by a quarter-point—as officials did last month and had been widely anticipated until very recently—or by a larger half-point, as they did in December.“I stress that no decision has been made on this,” Mr. Powell said Wednesday. “But if the totality of the data were to indicate that faster tightening is warranted, we would be prepared to increase the pace of rate hikes.”In addition to Friday’s employment report, he said two inflation reports next week, including the consumer-price index due Tuesday, could influence the decision.Economists at Bank of America and Morgan Stanley said Friday they believed the smaller quarter-point rate rise was more likely, but that was based on their expectations that core-CPI prices, which exclude food and energy, will rise 0.4% in February.“Absent a surprise on Tuesday, we think they will be comfortable” with a quarter-point rate rise, said Vincent Reinhart, chief economist at Dreyfus and Mellon and a former senior Fed economist.Others think the inflation report will need to be milder to prevent the Fed from raising rates by a half-point. Barring a major surprise on inflation, signs of broad-based strength in the labor market “strongly imply that the Federal Reserve will need to hike its policy rate by 50 basis points” this month, said Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at consulting firm RSM U.S.He said hardship due to interest-rate risks “among select small and medium-sized banks is not sufficient to cause the Fed to pull back from its primary objective” of combating inflation.If the CPI doesn’t notably slow down in February, “it will have been very hard to have opened the door to 50 and not walk through that door,” said Jason Furman, a Harvard economist who served as a top adviser to former President Barack Obama.Details on how the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which took control of the Silicon Valley Bank on Friday, resolves the bank could shape any spillovers to the rest of the banking system, especially small and midsize banks with a similar profile.SVB was focused heavily on lending to venture-capital firms, and the ultimate resolution of the bank’s assets could have broader implications for endowments and pension funds that have increased their exposures to venture capital, said Mr. Rosengren.Fed officials slowed their pace of rate rises last month when they increased their benchmark rate by a quarter-percentage-point to a range between 4.5% and 4.75%. That followed increases of a larger 0.5 percentage point in December and 0.75 percentage point in November and at three previous meetings.Officials said last month that moving in smaller steps would better allow them to assess the effects of their rapid increases last year and reduce the risk of raising rates too much.Mr. Powell said this week officials were likely to project at their coming meeting that they would raise rates to higher levels than they previously anticipated to bring inflation down. In December, most of them thought they would raise the fed-funds rate to between 5% and 5.5% this year.Since Fed officials last met on Feb. 1, several economic reports have revealed hiring, spending and inflation were stronger in January than expected. More important, data revisions showed inflation and labor demand didn’t soften as much as initially reported late last year.“We’re looking at a reversal, really, of what we thought we were seeing to some extent,” said Mr. Powell on Tuesday. “Nothing about the data suggests to me that we’ve tightened too much.”The Fed has been trying to curb investment, spending and hiring by raising rates, which makes it more expensive to borrow and can push down the price of assets such as stocks and real estate. The fed-funds rate influences other borrowing costs throughout the economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4456,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949889825,"gmtCreate":1678486467067,"gmtModify":1678486470255,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949889825","repostId":"2318544263","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2318544263","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678462287,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2318544263?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-10 23:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Stocks That Turned $10,000 Into $24,000 (or More)","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2318544263","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Consumer staples stocks aren't exciting, but they are reliable. And given enough time, that can easily double your money.","content":"<div>\n<p>Over the past decade, Procter & Gamble and Clorox have more than doubled investors' money, when you include reinvested dividends. That's actually pretty impressive given that these two companies hail ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/09/2-stocks-that-turned-10000-into-24000-or-more/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Stocks That Turned $10,000 Into $24,000 (or More)</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Stocks That Turned $10,000 Into $24,000 (or More)\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-10 23:31 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/09/2-stocks-that-turned-10000-into-24000-or-more/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Over the past decade, Procter & Gamble and Clorox have more than doubled investors' money, when you include reinvested dividends. That's actually pretty impressive given that these two companies hail ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/09/2-stocks-that-turned-10000-into-24000-or-more/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CLX":"高乐氏","PG":"宝洁"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/09/2-stocks-that-turned-10000-into-24000-or-more/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2318544263","content_text":"Over the past decade, Procter & Gamble and Clorox have more than doubled investors' money, when you include reinvested dividends. That's actually pretty impressive given that these two companies hail from the stodgy consumer staples sector, known for slow and steady growth. What's interesting here perhaps isn't the dollar figures, but rather the recent trends at each of these industry heavyweights.The big-picture numbersOver the past 10 years, Procter & Gamble turned a $10,000 investment into around $18,000 based on stock price appreciation alone. Those same figures are roughly what you would see with Clorox as well.But when you take their dividends into account (via reinvestment), the ending value jumps to around $24,000 for each. That's pretty impressive and easily beats out a lot of competitors in the consumer staples sector (though there are others that have stronger performances).The really interesting thing here is that P&G was facing notable business headwinds before shifting gears in the latter part of the previous decade. Since that point, when it jettisoned a large number of small brands so it could focus on its largest labels, it has done quite well.For example, even as inflation has pressured the company's margins, it has been able to push through price increases while growing or maintaining share in its most important market and product categories. Yes, earnings have fallen off a little, but that's to be expected when inflation is raging.Overall, investors have been very well rewarded for owning Procter & Gamble. And there's no sign that's going to change. Notably, the company has now increased its dividend annually for 67 consecutive years, making it a highly elite Dividend King. The most recent hike, in April of 2022, was roughly 5%. While not earth-shattering, it was a sign of the company's boring and reliable trend of consistently rewarding investors.With an attractive portfolio of highly valuable brands, Procter & Gamble is probably a solid option for long-term investors today even though its 2.65% dividend yield isn't as high as it has been in the past.This brings up Clorox's 3.05% yield, which is a bit higher, but actually toward the high end of the company's historical range.PG data by YCharts.Getting back on trackWhereas P&G faced material headwinds early in the last decade, Clorox faces headwinds today. And that could set up an interesting buying point for long-term dividend investors, noting that Clorox increased its dividend annually for more than four decades. On some level, Clorox is facing the same inflation troubles that have tripped up P&G of late. But Clorox's current problems also stem from the unusual supply and demand dynamics created by the pandemic.Clorox's namesake product line is tied tightly with cleaning supplies, which saw a huge increase in demand in the early days of the pandemic. That resulted in very strong financial performance as the company capitalized on it by expanding its product line. It even needed to hire contract manufacturers to keep up, a costly move. But strategically, it helped the company keep retailers' shelves filled. Investors bid the stock higher as a play on the global health scare.As the world learned to live with the coronavirus, and that demand subsided, sales of cleaning products fell and investors jumped ship. Then inflation hit, further crimping the company's margins.The pessimism surrounding the stock, really just the other side of the unbridled optimism in 2020, has been a huge headwind. But, like P&G in the past, Clorox is working hard to get things back in order. For example, it got rid of the high-cost contract manufacturing it needed during the pandemic, among other cost-cutting moves. It has also been aggressively increasing prices to offset inflation.But what's really interesting is that management believes the fiscal second quarter of 2023 was a turning point for margins. That suggests that things will get brighter in the quarter ahead, which might lead investors to place a higher valuation on the shares. If you are looking for a stock that's on sale today, Clorox could be worth a closer look.Same place, different storiesWith a $330 billion market cap, P&G is an industry giant. The recent episode in which it slimmed down its portfolio and improved results is a testament to its long-term strength and a reason conservative dividend investors might want to own it -- even if the stock is fully valued.Clorox, with a market cap of $19 billion, is tiny by comparison. However, it looks like it is on sale and, like P&G not too long ago, is taking action to fix a struggling business. If that plays out well, there's every reason to believe a higher stock price will be the end result.More aggressive types, and those who like turnarounds, will likely find this story attractive, noting that even with today's headwinds, Clorox's growth-oriented business has still been as strong a stock performer as P&G over the past decade.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PG":0.9,"CLX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3854,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949343981,"gmtCreate":1678399417744,"gmtModify":1678399419561,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949343981","repostId":"2317406182","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2317406182","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678375458,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2317406182?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-09 23:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Exceptional Growth Stocks That Could Jump 37.6% to 40.2% Higher, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2317406182","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These businesses are at the top of their respective industries, but you wouldn't know it by looking at their stock prices.","content":"<div>\n<p>Whether you're new to growth stock investing or you've been doing it your whole adult life, the past year has been extremely challenging. The Vanguard Growth ETF that peaked in late 2021 is still more...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/08/2-exceptional-growth-stocks-that-could-soar-to-acc/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Exceptional Growth Stocks That Could Jump 37.6% to 40.2% Higher, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Exceptional Growth Stocks That Could Jump 37.6% to 40.2% Higher, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-09 23:24 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/08/2-exceptional-growth-stocks-that-could-soar-to-acc/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Whether you're new to growth stock investing or you've been doing it your whole adult life, the past year has been extremely challenging. The Vanguard Growth ETF that peaked in late 2021 is still more...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/08/2-exceptional-growth-stocks-that-could-soar-to-acc/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","INMD":"InMode Ltd."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/08/2-exceptional-growth-stocks-that-could-soar-to-acc/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2317406182","content_text":"Whether you're new to growth stock investing or you've been doing it your whole adult life, the past year has been extremely challenging. The Vanguard Growth ETF that peaked in late 2021 is still more than 27% below its all-time high.Despite a terrible year for the major stock market indices, investment bank analysts have a lot of good things to say about their favorite growth stocks. They're so confident about the path forward for these two stocks that the average price target on them suggests big gains could be up ahead.1. AmazonYou're most likely familiar with Amazon's enormous e-commerce operation, but it's the businesses most consumers don't see that grab Wall Street's attention. Encouraged by its leading position in the market for cloud computing services, Wall Street analysts slapped a consensus price target on the stock that suggests it can rise 40.2% in the near term.In 2020 and 2021, Amazon doubled the strength of its fulfillment network to meet pandemic-driven demand that quickly subsided. The stock's way off from its peak because enormous profits from the early days of the pandemic turned into losses last year.I'm confident that a long-running trend favoring online shopping will push Amazon's e-commerce operation back into profitability. In the meantime, its cloud computing, and digital advertising businesses are more than capable of picking up the slack. Amazon Web Services reported operating income that soared 23% year over year to $22.8 billion in 2022.Fourth-quarter sales from Amazon's digital ad business grew 23% year over year to $11.6 billion. Now, it's one of the largest members of a digital ad industry already worth more than $760 billion annually.Right now, Amazon is trading for just 29.3 times 2021 earnings. That was a great year, but it isn't a high-water mark I expect to last very long. With leading positions in e-commerce, cloud computing, and digital advertising, this stock has everything it needs to deliver market-beating gains to patient investors.2. InModeIf a giant like Amazon doesn't suit you, consider this up-and-coming provider of medical technology. InMode develops and markets minimally invasive devices for a variety of cosmetic procedures.One of InMode's biggest growth drivers at the moment is BodyTite. With a narrow probe inserted beneath the skin, it performs a service similar to liposuction without the need for any incisions or downtime. The increasing popularity of its devices inspired Wall Street analysts to put a price target on this stock that implies a 37.6% gain.In 2021, InMode's surgery-free devices benefited from pandemic-inspired lockdowns that prevented the performance of more complicated cosmetic procedures. Despite the unwinding of those lockdowns, InMode reported sales that soared 21% year over year during the fourth quarter of 2022.InMode doesn't compete directly with Botox injections, but they are the most popular type of minimally invasive procedure. AbbVie reported cosmetic Botox sales that grew just 2.6% year over year in the fourth quarter of 2022.The market for noninvasive aesthetic treatments passed $60 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow by around 15.4% annually through 2030, according to Grand View Research. With a proven ability to grow its share of the enormous market for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, we can reasonably expect many more years of growth at double-digit annual percentage rates. At recent prices, though, you can buy InMode for just 13.7 times forward-looking earnings expectations.At this low multiple, long-term investors can beat the market even if its growth rate inexplicably falls by more than half. With a very strong chance to come out ahead, this is one of the best growth stocks you can buy right now.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9,"INMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3733,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949960640,"gmtCreate":1678314812281,"gmtModify":1678317812213,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949960640","repostId":"2317493336","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4035,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949039988,"gmtCreate":1678232365045,"gmtModify":1678232369125,"author":{"id":"3586514899418238","authorId":"3586514899418238","name":"Khoo18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a895cde27a6f60014dacbbc8853a5e1e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586514899418238","authorIdStr":"3586514899418238"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949039988","repostId":"2317469774","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2317469774","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678231248,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2317469774?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-08 07:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Silvergate Is in Talks With FDIC Officials on Ways to Salvage Bank","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2317469774","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Examiners have been on the ground since last week, people saidA decision on Silvergate’s future hasn","content":"<div>\n<p>Examiners have been on the ground since last week, people saidA decision on Silvergate’s future hasn’t yet been madeSilvergate Bank headquarters in La Jolla, California. Photographer: Ariana Drehsler/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-07/silvergate-in-talks-with-fdic-officials-on-ways-to-salvage-bank?srnd=markets-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Silvergate Is in Talks With FDIC Officials on Ways to Salvage Bank</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSilvergate Is in Talks With FDIC Officials on Ways to Salvage Bank\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-08 07:20 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-07/silvergate-in-talks-with-fdic-officials-on-ways-to-salvage-bank?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Examiners have been on the ground since last week, people saidA decision on Silvergate’s future hasn’t yet been madeSilvergate Bank headquarters in La Jolla, California. Photographer: Ariana Drehsler/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-07/silvergate-in-talks-with-fdic-officials-on-ways-to-salvage-bank?srnd=markets-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4211":"区域性银行","SI":"Shoulder Innovations, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-07/silvergate-in-talks-with-fdic-officials-on-ways-to-salvage-bank?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2317469774","content_text":"Examiners have been on the ground since last week, people saidA decision on Silvergate’s future hasn’t yet been madeSilvergate Bank headquarters in La Jolla, California. Photographer: Ariana Drehsler/BloombergUS regulators have been sent to the headquarters of Silvergate Capital Corp., as the troubled crypto-friendly bank looks for a way to stay in business.Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. officials have been discussing with management ways to avoid a shutdown, according to people familiar with the matter. One possible option involves lining up crypto-industry investors to help Silvergate shore up its liquidity, said one of the people. FDIC examiners arrived at the firm’s La Jolla, California, offices last week, the people said.The lender hasn’t made a decision on how to deal with its deepening financial turmoil, said the people, who asked not to be named discussing internal deliberations. FDIC examiners were authorized to go to the bank’s offices by the Federal Reserve, which is the lender’s main federal overseer, said one of the people.A representative for Silvergate didn’t respond to phone and e-mailed messages seeking comment. The FDIC said it doesn’t comment on “open and operating institutions.” The Fed declined to comment.The FDIC’s involvement is the latest sign of the urgency of Silvergate’s woes. Last week, the firm said mounting losses may force it to evaluate its viability. Because deposits from the lender’s clients are insured by the government, the regulator could play a major role in any potential solution.The involvement of the Fed and FDIC doesn’t mean that the bank won’t ultimately be able to navigate its troubles without regulators, another person said.As of Dec. 31, Silvergate’s deposits totaled $6.3 billion, according to filings by the firm. That’s less than half of the $13.2 billion it reported at the end of September.The FDIC examiners are reviewing the firm’s books and records, according to one of the people.Silvergate headquarters in La Jolla, California. Photographer: Ariana Drehsler/BloombergSilvergate was hit hard by crypto exchange FTX’s implosion, revealing in January that a surge in withdrawals by clients forced it to sell billions of dollars worth of assets and take steps to stabilize its balance sheet. The bank reported a $1 billion loss last quarter and last week announced that it was discontinuing its flagship crypto payments network after clients distanced themselves from the bank amid increasing uncertainty.Meanwhile, US prosecutors in the Justice Department’s fraud unit have been looking into Silvergate’s dealings with FTX and trading firm Alameda Research. The bank hasn’t been accused of any wrongdoing, and the investigation could end without charges being filed.Although no decision about Silvergate’s fate has been made, when a bank is on the financial brink, regulators can opt to put it into receivership — effectively taking over the lender.From there, the FDIC can come in and find ways to remedy the situation. In that scenario, the agency tends to favor merging the troubled institution into a healthy lender, but in the absence of a buyer, the agency could instead choose to pay off depositors, who are insured for as much as $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category.Regulator EffortsThe discussions around Silvergate’s future have hastened efforts by American bank regulators to get their hands around the digital-asset industry.On Tuesday, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell was asked about watchdogs’ efforts to oversee crypto. He didn’t mention Silvergate, or any specific firm in response.“Like everyone else, we’re watching what’s been happening in the crypto space, and what we see is quite a lot of turmoil,” he told lawmakers on the Senate Banking Committee. “What we’ve been doing is making sure that the regulated financial institutions that we supervise and regulate are careful, are taking great care in the ways that they engage with the whole crypto space and that they give us prior notice.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3981,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}