To The Moon

$Amazon.com(AMZN)$ $Procter & Gamble(PG)$ $Walt Disney(DIS)$ $Starbucks(SBUX)$ $Microsoft(MSFT)$ 

If I were eligible to vote in the US election, I would certainly refrain from supporting Trump and JD Vance. Their regressive views on women's roles and their apparent disregard for modern societal progress are wholly incompatible with my values and beliefs.

JD Vance’s Misogynistic Views: Stuck in the 1950s

Kia ora Tiger traders,

I recently watched "Hillbilly Elegy" to gain insight into JD Vance’s life and even contemplated purchasing the book for a more comprehensive understanding. However, a post on The Curve's Instagram caught my attention, prompting a deeper exploration into JD Vance’s views, which significantly altered my perception of him. Check out the post [here](https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9xykslNyOZ/?igsh=MWc2bjVpcDkwM2t6dw==). 

For those interested in empowering financial education for women, I highly recommend visiting The Curve’s website https://thecurveplatform.com

JD Vance, the "Hillbilly Elegy" author and current VP candidate with Donald Trump, has sparked heated debates with his archaic views on women, particularly those who are childless or working mothers. His statements seem to echo sentiments from the 1950s, as if he wishes to drag us back to an era when women were confined to the home and their worth was measured solely by their ability to bear children.

Vance has criticized women who prioritize their careers over having children, referring to them disparagingly as "childless cat ladies." He argues that such women lack a "direct stake" in the future of the country, implying that child-rearing is the only way for women to contribute to society. This outdated rhetoric ignores decades of progress and the invaluable contributions of women in all sectors of society [oai_citation:1,Attacking the left for choosing childlessness is fertile ground for a certain type of politician - New Statesman](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/08/attacking-left-choosing-childlessness-fertile-ground-certain-type-politician) [oai_citation:2,J.D. Vance's Misogynist Dog Whistle | Washington Monthly](https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/07/28/j-d-vances-misogynist-dog-whistle/).

Furthermore, Vance has the audacity to suggest that parents should remain in unhappy or even violent marriages for the sake of their children. He dismisses the well-being of individuals in these marriages, prioritizing a twisted notion of family stability over personal safety and happiness. Vance's skepticism about the benefits of divorce for children is not only misguided but dangerously ignorant [oai_citation:3,J.D. Vance's Political Views and Controversies: Inside the VP Candidate's Platform](https://people.com/jd-vance-political-views-controversies-vice-presidential-nominee-8678313) [oai_citation:4,'The View' Hosts React to J.D. Vance as Trump's VP Pick](https://www.tvinsider.com/1144000/the-view-july-16-jd-vance/).

Here's where it gets even more hypocritical: Vance's own family life stands in stark contrast to his public comments. His wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, is a successful lawyer, balancing her career with raising their three children. Clearly, in Vance's world, what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander. It seems his regressive views are reserved for everyone else's wives, not his own [oai_citation:5,J.D. Vance's Political Views and Controversies: Inside the VP Candidate's Platform](https://people.com/jd-vance-political-views-controversies-vice-presidential-nominee-8678313) [oai_citation:6,J.D. Vance's Misogynist Dog Whistle | Washington Monthly](https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/07/28/j-d-vances-misogynist-dog-whistle/).

Scathing Criticism from Various Sources

1. New Statesman: Criticized Vance for focusing on the fertility factor, suggesting that his views are reminiscent of a time when women's worth was solely tied to childbearing [oai_citation:7,Attacking the left for choosing childlessness is fertile ground for a certain type of politician - New Statesman](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2021/08/attacking-left-choosing-childlessness-fertile-ground-certain-type-politician).

2. The View: Joy Behar lambasted Vance's stance, highlighting how his views on staying in abusive marriages and restricting abortion rights are not only dangerous but completely out of touch with modern values [oai_citation:8,'The View' Hosts React to J.D. Vance as Trump's VP Pick](https://www.tvinsider.com/1144000/the-view-july-16-jd-vance/).

3. Washington Monthly: Described Vance's use of terms like "weird cat ladies" as a misogynistic dog whistle aimed at pandering to the far-right, misogynist base [oai_citation:9,J.D. Vance's Misogynist Dog Whistle | Washington Monthly](https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/07/28/j-d-vances-misogynist-dog-whistle/).

Notable Quotes from Famous Individuals

1. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: "Women will only have true equality when men share with them the responsibility of bringing up the next generation."

2. Eleanor Roosevelt: "A woman is like a tea bag; you never know how strong it is until it's in hot water."

3. Sheryl Sandberg: "We cannot change what we are not aware of, and once we are aware, we cannot help but change."

These quotes underline the progressive viewpoint and provide a stark contrast to Vance’s regressive, hypocritical stance.

Relevant Stocks that could be impacted:

1. Procter & Gamble Co. (PG)

- Relevance: Procter & Gamble produces a wide range of consumer goods, many of which are targeted at women. Their commitment to diversity and inclusion could be at odds with Vance's views, potentially leading to consumer backlash.

- Impact: The company's image and consumer base could be affected if Vance's regressive views gain traction, as they conflict with P&G's inclusive policies.

- Sources: Reuters, CNBC

2. The Walt Disney Company (DIS)

- Relevance: Disney is a major media company known for its inclusive policies and support for working parents. Negative sentiments from leaders like Vance could challenge Disney's progressive brand image.

- Impact: Disney's reputation and employee satisfaction might suffer if such views become more mainstream, affecting their diverse workforce and audience.

- Sources: Bloomberg, Fortune

3. Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)

- Relevance: Starbucks is known for its inclusive workplace policies and support for working mothers. Vance's outdated views could spark internal and external conflicts within companies that uphold such values.

- Impact: Public perception and employee morale at Starbucks could be negatively impacted, influencing customer loyalty and brand image.

- Sources: Business Insider, Forbes

4. Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN)

- Relevance: Amazon is a major employer with a diverse workforce, including many women. Their policies on workplace equality make them relevant in this context.

- Impact: Amazon's efforts to maintain a progressive and inclusive workplace could be undermined, potentially affecting employee retention and public perception.

- Sources: Wall Street Journal, The New York Times

5. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)

- Relevance: Microsoft promotes gender diversity and has numerous programs supporting women in tech, making them pertinent to discussions on workplace equality.

- Impact: The company could face challenges in talent retention and reputation management if regressive views like Vance's gain more acceptance.

- Sources: TechCrunch, The Guardian

1. Walmart Inc. (WMT)

• Relevance: As a major employer with extensive diversity and inclusion programs, Vance’s regressive views could conflict with Walmart’s commitment to an inclusive workforce, potentially leading to public backlash.

• Sources: Markets Insider

2. Target Corporation (TGT)

• Relevance: Target is known for its progressive policies, including support for working mothers. Any shift towards regressive views on women’s roles could negatively impact its brand and employee morale.

• Sources: Business Insider

3. Nike Inc. (NKE)

• Relevance: Nike promotes gender equality and supports female athletes and employees. Vance’s views could create a disconnect with Nike’s values and customer base.

• Sources: Wall Street Journal

4. Intel Corporation (INTC)

• Relevance: Intel emphasizes diversity and inclusion in its workforce. Vance’s views could undermine these efforts, affecting employee retention and public perception.

• Sources: TechCrunch

5. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS)

• Relevance: As a financial institution promoting gender diversity and supporting working parents, Vance’s outdated views could impact its efforts and reputation.

• Sources: The Guardian

Happy trading ahead! Cheers, BC 🍀

@TigerPicks @Tiger_comments @MillionaireTiger @Tiger_Earnings @TigerStars @TigerOptions @Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @SPACE ROCKET @nomadic_m @Hen Solo @Kiwi Tigress @Tui Jude @CaptainTiger @koolgal @Shyon