To The Moon

$BP PLC(BP)$ $Total SA(TTE)$ $SHELL PLC(RYDAF)$ $Eni SpA(E)$ $Exxon Mobil(XOM)$

China Reducing U.S. Oil Imports

Welcome back from Xmas holiday. Today, we're focusing on the escalating energy crisis that threatens both Europe and the United States as major commodity consumers and producers. This is largely fueled by the G7 disruptive moves against China-Russia, starting with China's significant withdrawal from U.S. energy imports.

For years, China was a major buyer of U.S. crude oil. In 2023, they imported a staggering 450,000 barrels daily—more than double their 2022 volumes—becoming the second-largest importer of U.S. crude, trailing only the Netherlands. This surge was driven by China's post-lockdown recovery, which required massive energy inputs to ramp up industrial and economic activities. Chinese demand outpaced even major importers like South Korea, the UK.

However, 2024 has marked a sharp turning point. Escalating tensions in the U.S.-China economic war, driven by sanctions on advanced chips, tariffs on solar panels, and import taxes on electric vehicles, have prompted Beijing to retaliate. China is leveraging its industrial and energy strategies to counter these moves.

In response to U.S. trade barriers, China has significantly reduced its reliance on U.S. energy imports. Crude oil exports to China plummeted by 46%, from 150 million barrels to less than 82 million. This drop has pushed China from the second-largest importer of U.S. crude to sixth place, with Europe now occupying the second spot.

This shift underscores the broader implications of the U.S.-China trade war. While some might argue that the U.S. can redirect its energy exports to allies, China's reduced demand signals a bifurcation in global energy markets, with geopolitical and economic ramifications that cannot be ignored.

Stay tuned as I going unpacking the fallout from this unfolding energy and trade crisis.

U.S. Needs Their Gooner Europe as an Energy Customer!

China is now sourcing the majority of its oil imports from Russia, a convenient arrangement given their proximity and established pipeline networks. With no sanctions hindering this energy trade, Russia has become China’s largest crude supplier, accounting for nearly 20% of its market share. Beijing imports over 2.1 million barrels daily from Russia—five times the volume it was buying from the U.S. This poses significant challenges for the petrodollar system, among other economic frameworks.

The petrodollar system relies on oil transactions being settled in U.S. dollars. However, China and Russia have shifted away from trading in the reserve currency. Chinese refiners are settling payments bilaterally, using the Chinese yuan (RMB) to pay Russian suppliers. Russia, in turn, uses this yuan to purchase goods from Chinese industries. As China's economy grows and domestic consumption rises, it is likely to experience an energy boom fueled by Russian oil and gas, further sidelining U.S. energy supplies.

The implications for U.S. energy exports are troubling. In July, Chinese demand for oil decreased, driven by price sensitivity. Asia, in general, showed a preference for cheaper oil. U.S. crude, which incurs additional costs due to transportation across the Pacific and through the Panama Canal, became less competitive. At one point, U.S. oil was $2 more expensive per barrel—a significant margin in the refining business, where profit margins are razor-thin. As a result, Asian refiners, particularly those supplying China, have turned to closer, more affordable sources like Russia and the Middle East.

If the U.S. continues its tariff war on China, Beijing's response is predictable: it will keep reducing its reliance on U.S. crude and redirect Asian demand. This trend is problematic for the petrodollar system, as both China and Russia increasingly trade in yuan, sidelining the dollar.

What does this mean for the U.S.? It underscores the urgency of finding alternative markets for its energy exports. This is why the U.S. is pushing Europe to purchase significant quantities of American oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). While reducing the EU's trade deficit with the U.S. may be one motivation, the primary goal is to secure ongoing demand for U.S. energy at premium prices.

As long as Europe continues to buy expensive U.S. energy, American producers and exporters can maintain profitability, which is crucial for their long-term plans extending into 2025 and beyond. By 2028, this strategy will likely play a key role in sustaining the U.S. energy sector and its dominance in global markets.

U.S. Energy Producers Face Significant Risks

The U.S. plans to nearly double its liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity over the next four years, with an additional 10 billion cubic feet per day expected to come online. While this expansion highlights America's role as the world's largest gas exporter and a leading oil producer, the issue lies in production costs and the shifting dynamics of global energy demand.

Unlike Saudi and Russia, which benefits from significantly lower production costs, U.S. energy producers must maintain high demand to remain competitive. For example, Qatar, another major energy player, can produce natural gas at costs as low as $0.30 per million BTU. In contrast, U.S. production costs range from $2 to $5 per million BTU, making it harder for American producers to compete on price alone.

This cost disparity becomes even more critical as BRICS nations, led by China and Russia, consolidate their energy sourcing. If these countries increasingly rely on energy supplies from the Middle East and Moscow, U.S. energy producers will face shrinking market opportunities.

China's decoupling from U.S. energy imports is particularly concerning. Reduced Chinese demand could trigger broader disruptions in global energy markets, potentially sparking an "energy war." This shift also threatens the U.S. dollar's position in global trade, as energy transactions between BRICS nations and their partners often bypass the dollar in favor of other currencies like the yuan.

To mitigate these risks, the U.S. is likely to exert significant pressure on Europe to serve as a consistent and reliable market for its oil and gas exports. Securing Europe as a captive customer is essential for maintaining the profitability of American energy producers, especially as they expand capacity in anticipation of future demand.

For the U.S., the stakes are high. With rising production costs and evolving global trade dynamics, the situation demands strategic action to protect its energy industry and economic interests. The coming years will likely see intensified efforts to solidify energy trade relationships with allies, particularly in Europe.

EU Going To Faces Gas Shock in 2025

Europe is on the brink of its own energy crisis, with gas flows steadily being cut off. Major pipelines that once supplied the EU with cheap energy have either ceased operations or are severely restricted.

The Yamal pipeline, which delivered gas to Europe via Poland, has stopped flows entirely. Similarly, the Nord Stream pipelines that destroy by USA, a crucial source of natural gas for the region, are completely non-operational. What remains are limited flows through the TurkStream pipeline and the Ukraine transit route. Should these remaining pipelines shut down, Europe will face the complete loss of cheap pipeline-supplied gas.

This energy shortfall is already having devastating effects on industrial economies like Germany. Deindustrialization is accelerating as access to affordable energy becomes increasingly constrained, forcing industries to curtail production or shut down entirely.

The situation points to an impending energy crisis for the EU, with 2025 shaping up to be a critical juncture. If alternative sources or solutions are not secured, Europe's economic and industrial stability will face severe challenges.

Europe's Russian Gas Shutdown Looms

By 2025, Europe will face mounting challenges as it contends with a rapidly industrializing China and increasingly competitive global manufacturing. Affordable energy, a critical factor for industrial output, is becoming ever more scarce. The EU is depleting its gas reserves at an alarming rate, with storage levels already down to 75%—a significant drop from 90% during the same period last year. As winter approaches, reserves will dwindle further, necessitating costly replenishment ahead of the next cold season.

This situation places upward pressure on gas prices, especially if Europe must rely more heavily on expensive U.S. LNG. The problem is compounded by the impending collapse of the Ukraine-Russia gas transit agreement. By 2025, Russian gas flows through Ukraine are likely to cease entirely. Russia’s Gazprom has already factored in a total shutdown, and Ukraine has little incentive to renew the deal, given its economic benefits to Russia.

The fallout from this shutdown will ripple across Europe, with some countries, like Slovakia and Hungary, facing acute energy supply disruptions. These nations depend heavily on cheap Russian gas and could experience severe economic repercussions if alternative sources are not secured. Eastern European countries are understandably panicked, as supplies via the Ukraine transit line could halt within days once the agreement ends.

While the European Commission has downplayed the potential impact, the numbers tell a different story. In the first eight months of 2024, 112 terawatt-hours of energy were delivered through the Ukraine transit system, equivalent to 5% of the EU's total energy imports and half of its Russian pipeline gas supply. Losing this affordable energy will force Europe to turn to costlier alternatives, such as U.S. LNG, driving prices even higher.

Even replacing Russian pipeline gas with Russian LNG is not a viable solution, as costs would still rise significantly. For Europe, this creates a lose-lose situation, with energy expenses climbing regardless of the source. The looming energy crunch threatens industrial output, economic stability, and jobs across the region, making the need for strategic energy planning more urgent than ever.

Gooner 7’s Growing Energy Dilemma

The situation in Europe has reached a tipping point, with Slovakia openly threatening Ukraine with power cuts if Russian gas supplies are halted. While it’s uncertain if Slovakia will act on this threat, the tension underscores the urgency of the energy crisis facing EU economies. Whether or not Brussels wants to acknowledge it, much of the continent remains reliant on Russian energy.

If Ukraine shuts down the remaining Russian gas transit routes, the winners are clear: Asia, particularly China and India. Gazprom would be compelled to redirect supplies eastward, increasing availability and pushing gas prices down for Beijing. This would give China a significant economic advantage, as lower energy costs translate into even cheaper goods, further intensifying competition with Western industries.

This energy crisis has the potential to trigger a chain reaction of economic challenges for the West. As China benefits from affordable energy and continues to reduce its reliance on U.S. oil, Western industries face mounting pressure. Meanwhile, Europe's dependence on expensive LNG alternatives and dwindling gas reserves adds another layer of instability.

The question remains: Will China cut even more U.S. oil imports? And will Ukraine halt the flow of Russian gas to Europe? These developments could shape the global energy and economic landscape in the years ahead.

@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub