🎯πŸ–₯οΈβš›οΈ Japan’s Quantum Gambit: Can U.S. Leaders Hold Their Crown? βš›οΈπŸ–₯️🎯

$IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$ $D-Wave Quantum Inc.(QBTS)$ $IBM(IBM)$ 

πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ Japan just fired a shot across the bow of the U.S., China quantum duopoly. RIKEN and Fujitsu unveiled a 256-qubit superconducting quantum computer, but that’s just their warm-up. The roadmap is aggressive: 1,000 qubits by 2026, and by 2030, a 250 logical qubit machine that could be 25% more powerful than IBM’s best. Logical qubits matter; they mean fewer errors, faster calculations, and real-world breakthroughs in AI, cryptography, and national security.

This is a direct challenge to IBM’s quantum roadmap. Big Blue has been building its edge with the 1,121-qubit Condor and plans for large-scale fault-tolerant systems, but Japan’s push compresses the competitive timeline. If Tokyo hits its targets, IBM could face pressure to accelerate deployments, deepen partnerships, and defend its contracts with U.S. agencies.

For pure-play U.S. quantum stocks, this is a double-edged sword. IonQ (IONQ), already in a steep multi-year uptrend, gets validation that quantum hardware demand is real, but also faces a new competitor in a nation willing to outspend for dominance. Price action this week shows resilience, bouncing off mid-channel Keltner support at 37.50 with eyes back on the 47–50 zone.

D-Wave (QBTS), the quantum annealing specialist, has seen explosive momentum since late 2024. The weekly chart shows strong trend integrity above the 21-EMA, with buyers defending the 16.50–17 range.

The stakes are massive. Quantum supremacy is more than a headline; it’s the gateway to breakthroughs in drug discovery, climate modeling, cybersecurity, and military strategy. With Japan’s entry, the race isn’t just about speed, it’s about who gets to dictate the standards.

πŸ“Š Technical setups right now:

β€’ IONQ: Weekly Keltner midline support intact; breakout above 45.60 could trigger another 10-point leg higher.

β€’ QBTS: Coiling just under 19; sustained closes above 20 would mark a fresh price discovery phase.

β€’ IBM: Pulling back to test the 200-week EMA near 240; failure to hold could open 225, but reclaiming 260 would reassert bullish control.

πŸ’‘ Watchlist catalysts:

β€’ IBM’s next roadmap update: will they match Japan’s 2030 logical qubit goal?

β€’ U.S. federal quantum funding announcements.

β€’ Institutional positioning shifts; recently, a major U.S. pension rotated out of Alibaba into IonQ, D-Wave, and Rigetti.

The quantum crown is now contested on three fronts: Washington, Beijing, and Tokyo. The winners won’t just own a technology; they’ll own the future.

πŸ“’ Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets πŸš€πŸ“ˆ I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! πŸ€

Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC πŸ“ˆπŸš€πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€

@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerWire @TigerPicks @TigerObserver 

# πŸ’°Stocks to watch today?(23 Dec)

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment(19οΌ‰

  • Top
  • Latest
  • BankeA
    Β·08-10
    TOP
    with the QBTS trends back and forth between $20 and under do you think this would stabilise as a $25 stock this year?
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode:Β 
      I appreciate you reading my article and taking the time to comment, cheers πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      β˜’οΈβ“—β“β“Ÿβ“Ÿβ“¨ β“£β“‘β“β““β“˜β“β“– ⓐⓗⓔⓐⓓ! β“’β“—β“”β“”β“‘β“’, β“‘β“’πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • BarcodeReplying toBankeA:Β 
      I’m glad it helped clarify. Annealing’s a different architecture from gate-based systems like Rigetti’s. It’s optimised for specific optimisation and sampling problems, which gives D-Wave a niche edge even if it’s not chasing the same universal quantum computing path.
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    View more 2 comments
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode:Β 
      β˜’οΈβ“—β“β“Ÿβ“Ÿβ“¨ β“£β“‘β“β““β“˜β“β“– ⓐⓗⓔⓐⓓ! β“’β“—β“”β“”β“‘β“’, β“‘β“’πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      You sharing this helps the whole network, thanks CCW πŸ’«
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      Thanks for reading my article CCW ✨
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
  • Tui Jude
    Β·08-11

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode:Β 
      β˜’οΈβ“—β“β“Ÿβ“Ÿβ“¨ β“£β“‘β“β““β“˜β“β“– ⓐⓗⓔⓐⓓ! β“’β“—β“”β“”β“‘β“’, β“‘β“’πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      πŸ“’ I really appreciate the repost, your support means a lot TJ πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      Thanks for reading TJ ⭐️
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
  • Kiwi Tigress
    Β·08-10

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode:Β 
      β˜’οΈβ“—β“β“Ÿβ“Ÿβ“¨ β“£β“‘β“β““β“˜β“β“– ⓐⓗⓔⓐⓓ! β“’β“—β“”β“”β“‘β“’, β“‘β“’πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      πŸ“’ I really appreciate the repost, your support means a lot
      08-11
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode:Β 
      Thanks for reading KT ✨✨✨
      08-11
      Reply
      Report