🎯🔬🧠 Quantum Policy Mirage: Navigating the Equity Stake Echo Chamber 24Oct25 NZT 🧠🔬🎯

$D-Wave Quantum Inc.(QBTS)$ $IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$ $Rigetti Computing(RGTI)$ I’ve watched enough tape over the years to know when headlines spark a frenzy faster than reality can catch up. Today’s chatter about the Trump administration’s supposed plan to take equity stakes in quantum firms like IONQ, RGTI, QBTS and QUBT fits that pattern perfectly.

The Wall Street Journal floated whispers of Commerce Department talks, at least $10 million per firm in funding for shares, before Reuters snapped back with a flat denial: “No active negotiations underway.” That gap between rumour and rebuttal triggered the volatility you see below.

Quantum Computing Stocks Are on a Wild Ride, policy chatter turns small floats into rocket fuel.

⚙️ Price Action Breakdown: Riding the Headlines

📊 QBTS +20.5 % intraday to $41.33 before settling at $34.40, still above its 40-DMA ($31.20). Reclaim $35.50 = path to the $38–40 liquidity shelf; lose it and we rotate back to the low 30s. Volume ≈ 3 × average but fading into the close, which signals profit-taking, not accumulation.

📈 IONQ +15 % premarket to $83.83 → $55.45. RSI 72 → 58; watch for bullish divergence if the 50-DMA ($48) holds.

⚡ RGTI & QUBT | RGTI +22 % to $53.54 → $36.06 (testing 20-DMA $34.50). QUBT +14 % to $21.23 → $14.87 (coiling above 200-DMA $12).

Headline flush; reaction beats prediction.

💸 Options Flow: Institutional Fingerprints

Here’s what the tape’s really saying; smart money hedged both edges.

• $1.03 M buy – QBTS 19 C 31 Oct 25 (deep ITM, synthetic stock setup)

• $257 K block – QBTS 31.5 P 24 Oct 25 (short-dated protection)

• $902 K buy – QBTS 41 C 20 Feb 26 (long-dated convex bet on policy follow-through)

Put/Call ≈ 0.4 but put IV 85 % > call IV 72 %; funds are pricing volatility, not euphoria.



Three sides funded; smart money hedging headline tails.

🌎 Macro & Policy Backdrop

The Intel 10 % stake for grants set the precedent. Add the Pentagon’s “golden share” in MP Materials and you see a template: Washington anchors strategic tech. Quantum fits that national-security playbook.

🇨🇳 China = $15 B Quantum National Lab by 2025.

🇪🇺 EU Quantum Flagship adds €1 B 2025–2030.

🇺🇸 CHIPS Act 2.0 rumours include Quantum carve-outs.

Commerce official denies active talks; the headline that triggered profit-taking.

📉 Fundamentals That Actually Anchor the Story

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) → €10 M Advantage2 order with Swiss Quantum Technology SA = real revenue contract. TTM rev ≈ $15 M (+178 % YoY).

IONQ → $2 B Heights Capital funding; Q3 rev $22 M (+83 % YoY); gate fidelity 99.99 %.

RGTI → $1.8 M quarterly rev; $571 M cash runway via UK grants.

QUBT → $61 K rev but $750 M private placement fuel for speculative moves.

🚨 Catalysts & Risks to Track

Next up: Nov Fed minutes (rate path signal), IONQ Q3 earnings (mid-Nov), any Commerce update.

Liquidity razor-thin; QBTS avg vol 15 M but true float ≈ 2 M. IV extreme → expect post-rumour crush. Size 1–2 % max per name, defined risk only.

🚀 Playbook: Trade the Echo, Not the Mirage

I’m watching QBTS Nov25 35C spreads ($2.50 debit) → target $4.50 on policy confirmation.

IONQ Dec25 60C ($3.20) → stop $2.00.

I trail all stock exposure below the 40-DMA. No hero positions overnight; volatility is the edge, not the enemy.

💬 If equity stakes lock in, does annealing (QBTS) out-scale trapped-ion (IONQ)? And how would you structure a butterfly to catch the IV crush after confirmation?

📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀

Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀

@Tiger_comments @TigerPM @TigerStars @Daily_Discussion @TigerObserver 

# Quantum Move! Is This the Next “Rare Earth” Boom?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment13

  • Top
  • Latest
  • PetS
    ·10-24
    TOP
    The policy parallels with MP Materials were sharp; that historical context makes the whole rumour cycle feel less random. I’m scaling into small QBTS exposure myself since your breakdown shows where volatility meets validation.
    Reply
    Report
  • Kiwi Tigress
    ·10-24
    TOP
    That was such a tight macro-to-micro breakdown. You connected Trump’s policy rhetoric straight into technical setups without losing rhythm. The IONQ RSI divergence call is spot on; if we see a reclaim of that EMA, momentum traders will pile in 💨
    Reply
    Report
  • I llke how you tied the Commerce denial to liquidity compression; that 40DMA on QBTS is the real battlefield. I’m still watching RGTI’s 20DMA interaction since it mirrors your mid-cycle setup, macro noise aside, that’s the cleanest technical signal on the board.
    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·10-24
    TOP
    The part about funds straddling both sides hit home; I’ve seen that same options fingerprint in NVDA before an earnings ramp. Your take on IV asymmetry explains the hedging beautifully; I’m eyeing how it unwinds into next week’s Fed minutes.
    Reply
    Report
  • Barcode
    ·10-24
    TOP
    @CaptainTiger @Tiger_comments Captain Tiger, I’m seeking some insight into a recurring issue: recent image uploads appear to be failing to process or attach correctly. Could this stem from a temporary platform-side latency in media handling, a size-format mismatch, or a permissions filter on the content pipeline? I’d appreciate a technical clarification on the root cause so I can adjust my post-creation workflow accordingly.
    Reply
    Report
  • Queengirlypops
    ·10-24
    TOP
    Wild price action today, BC. Quantum names went full tilt before that Commerce denial hit. QBTS was a total beast holding above the 40DMA. I’m watching for that bounce you mentioned around $35.50 it’s like a coiled spring waiting to rip again 🧃
    Reply
    Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·10-24
    TOP
    Loved how you framed the annealing vs trapped-ion architecture; it’s the first time I’ve seen someone separate hype from hardware. I’m watching IONQ’s cash runway like you said, it’s the kind of metric traders ignore until it matters.
    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·10-24

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·10-24

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report