🚨🥫📉 Berkshire Breaks the Spell: The Kraft Heinz $KHC Overhang Nobody Can Ignore 📉🥫

$The Kraft Heinz Company(KHC)$ $Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)$  $Procter & Gamble(PG)$ 

21Jan26 ET 🇺🇸 | 22Jan26 NZT 🇳🇿

🧠 This is a structural unwind, not a headline reaction.

Focus is firmly on The Kraft Heinz Company ($KHC) after a regulatory filing revealed that Berkshire Hathaway may offer to sell 325M+ shares, effectively its 27.5–28% stake. That is not optionality. That is supply entering the market.

📜 A decade-long chapter is coming to a close.

This investment dates back to 2015 and stands out as a rare misfire tied to leverage, cost cutting, and a consumer staples environment that permanently shifted. A full Berkshire exit removes the psychological backstop that has quietly supported sentiment for years.

📉 Price action is already validating the risk.

The stock gapped roughly −7% at the open and has now printed its lowest level since the Covid crash. The 60DMA has acted as a hard ceiling for months, rejecting every rally attempt. At −23.5% YoY, this is persistent trend damage, not a failed bounce.

📊 Positioning is where vulnerability becomes reflexive.

Options data tells a clear story. Calls have completely overwhelmed puts, with a 50-day call-to-put ratio of 11.42, marking a 12-month extreme. Optimism has crowded into a deteriorating structure. When that unwinds, it tends to amplify downside rather than absorb it.

🌪️ Volatility remains complacent.

Despite the supply overhang and positioning imbalance, SVI sits near 26%, around the 25th percentile. Volatility is cheap relative to the risk being introduced. Cheap vol combined with crowded calls is rarely benign.

🏦 The broader signal sits at the Berkshire level.

This would represent one of the first major exits since Warren Buffett stepped aside as CEO, all while Berkshire holds roughly $381B in cash. The message here is balance-sheet discipline and legacy cleanup, not tactical rotation.

🔎 The framework is straightforward.

This is not being treated as a trade. It is being treated as a supply-driven reset. When a long-term anchor shareholder prepares to exit, technicals break, optimism crowds the options tape, and volatility stays cheap, markets do not resolve quietly. They reprice. That process rarely finishes in days. It finishes when ownership changes hands.

$BRK.B $KHC

📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀

Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀 @Tiger_comments @Daily_Discussion @TigerObserver @TigerPicks @TigerStars @TigerWire 

# 💰Stocks to watch today?(26 Jan)

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment13

  • Top
  • Latest
  • PetS
    ·01-22
    这感觉更像是一个跨资产信号,而不是单个股票事件。伯克希尔哈撒韦层面的资本纪律,而史泰博则结构性分化,这是一个宏观问题。观看$标普500ETF(SPY)$防御性与周期性进行确认。
    Reply
    Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·01-22
    I keep coming back to structure. Broken support, failed momentum, and macro complacency rarely resolve quietly. The volatility percentile is the tell. $Mondelez(MDLZ)$ has held its regime far better than $The Kraft Heinz Company(KHC)$ through earnings cycles.
    Reply
    Report
  • I’m aligned with your take. The supply overhang changes the regime entirely. When volatility stays cheap and positioning crowds calls, the liquidity pocket below support matters. Watching how this structure plays out alongside $Procter & Gamble(PG)$ relative strength.
    Reply
    Report
  • 好吧,但你的帖子实际上让我点击了一下,这不是噪音,这是政权的东西,当评级堆积时供应受到打击,波动性沉睡,结构已经破裂,这就是势头翻转的方式,每个人都充满乐观情绪,而流动性口袋位于下方,提醒我什么时候$PayPal(PYPL)$只是不断滑动和流动从未拯救它,低调可怕的设置但也干净,市场真的不会礼貌地重新定价,不是吗?🔋
    Reply
    Report
  • yeah this one hit different tbh. not just a headline dump, feels like structure breaking while everyone’s still leaning calls. lowkey wild vol hasn’t moved yet. kinda reminds me of when $Walt Disney(DIS)$ kept leaking before everyone noticed
    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·01-22
    Your post nails the flow risk. That call skew into weakening momentum is classic positioning vulnerability. When resistance keeps rejecting and volatility lags, gamma and Vanna can flip fast. $Coca-Cola(KO)$ offers an interesting cross asset contrast here.
    Reply
    Report
  • TAND
    ·01-22

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • PetS
    ·01-22

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·01-22

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·01-22

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report