From EVs to Humanoids: Can China’s Carmakers Find Their Next Growth Engine?

China’s electric-vehicle market is entering a tougher stage. Domestic passenger-car sales fell 23.7% year on year in August, while domestic EV and plug-in hybrid sales declined 10.1%. Exports remain a bright spot, with passenger-vehicle exports rising 77.5% and EV and plug-in hybrid exports climbing 154.7%, but intensifying competition at home is putting greater pressure on automakers to find new sources of growth.

For the stock market, this makes the industry’s expanding push into humanoid robotics increasingly relevant. Companies including $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$, BYD, Chery and GAC are trying to extend capabilities developed for intelligent vehicles—such as AI, batteries, sensors, autonomous systems and advanced manufacturing—into robotics. The key question for investors is therefore no longer simply how many cars these companies can sell, but whether humanoids could eventually become a credible second growth curve and influence how the market values them.

Why EV Makers Are Moving Into Humanoids

The transition from EVs to humanoid robots is less unusual than it appears. Smart vehicles and humanoids rely on many of the same underlying technologies, including AI perception, computing chips, batteries, electric motors, sensors, motion control and large-scale manufacturing.

This gives established EV manufacturers a potential head start. Years of investment in autonomous driving, software-defined vehicles and vertically integrated supply chains mean they already possess much of the technological and manufacturing infrastructure required to enter robotics.

In simple terms, the same technologies that allow a car to perceive, understand and react to the physical world can increasingly be adapted to a robot that walks, manipulates objects and interacts with people.

XPeng Is Making One of the Clearest Moves

$XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$ has emerged as one of the most visible examples of the EV-to-robotics transition. On September 8, the company announced that its IRON humanoid robot had autonomously walked off its newly commissioned production line, marking another step from prototype development toward manufacturing.

The company plans to initially deploy IRON robots in its own stores and campuses before moving toward broader commercial deliveries in China and overseas markets in 2027.

Investor interest is already becoming visible through the capital being committed to the business. $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$’s robotics unit recently raised more than US$900 million, giving it a post-money valuation above US$6.3 billion. The company is also targeting monthly production capacity of around 1,000 IRON units by the end of 2026.

This matters because $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$’s core EV business continues to face intense competition. If robotics eventually develops into a meaningful source of revenue, investors may begin valuing the company not only on vehicle deliveries and automotive margins, but also on its exposure to AI, robotics and Physical AI.

The Trend Is Bigger Than XPeng

$XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$ is not alone. BYD has also been developing humanoid robotics capabilities, building on technologies already used across its vehicle manufacturing, electronics and intelligent-driving businesses.

Chery, through its AiMOGA Robotics business, is expanding robot deployments and exploring broader commercialization, while GAC has established a dedicated robotics platform aimed at industrial and service applications.

The significance for investors extends beyond the automakers themselves. Humanoid robots require components including motors, actuators, reducers, sensors, batteries, AI chips and precision-manufactured parts. If the industry moves toward large-scale commercialization, the investment theme could therefore expand from EV manufacturers into a much broader robotics supply chain.

A New Valuation Story — But Not Yet a New Profit Engine

The stock-market appeal of humanoid robotics is straightforward: it gives automakers a new growth narrative at a time when competition in the EV market is becoming increasingly intense.

A company traditionally valued as an automaker could potentially begin to attract a different valuation framework if investors believe it has credible businesses across EVs, autonomous driving, AI and robotics.

However, that does not mean every robotics announcement deserves a higher valuation.

Humanoid robots remain expensive, technically complex and difficult to commercialize at scale. Tasks that look impressive in demonstrations may still be challenging to reproduce reliably in factories, stores or homes. In many industrial environments, conventional automation can also remain cheaper and more efficient.

The distinction investors may increasingly need to make is therefore between companies that can build a humanoid robot and companies that can build a profitable humanoid-robot business.

What Should Investors Watch Next?

For robotics to materially change the investment case for Chinese automakers, the next stage will need to be measured in commercial results rather than demonstrations.

Investors should watch for actual customer orders, production volumes, robot pricing, manufacturing costs, deployment scenarios and—most importantly—revenue contribution.

If these indicators improve, humanoid robotics could gradually broaden the way companies such as $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$ and BYD are valued, shifting part of the investment narrative from traditional auto manufacturing toward Physical AI and intelligent machines.

For now, humanoids provide China’s EV industry with something particularly valuable as its domestic market matures: a potential new growth story. Whether that story develops into a meaningful second business could become one of the more important questions surrounding Chinese auto stocks heading into 2027.

🪙 Tiger Coins Interaction

💬 POLL | Can humanoid robots become the next major growth engine for China’s EV makers?

🤖 A. Yes — Robotics could significantly expand their long-term growth potential
🚗 B. Maybe — EVs will remain the core business for years
⚠️ C. Too early — Commercialization and profitability are still uncertain
📈 D. I prefer the robotics supply chain — Components may offer the clearer opportunity

Vote in the poll and share your view in the comments — Tiger Coins are up for grabs! 🎁

Which company do you think has the strongest EV-to-robotics advantage: XPeng, BYD, Chery, GAC, or another player?

# 45 Cybercabs on the Road — Enough to Justify a $1.49 Trillion Autonomy Narrative?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment6

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Shyon
    ·09-09 23:45
    Personally, I think humanoid robotics could become a meaningful second growth curve for Chinese EV makers, but I wouldn’t value it as a major profit engine yet. The technology overlap with EVs is real—AI, batteries, sensors, motors and manufacturing give these companies a natural head start. XPeng stands out to me because it is moving aggressively from prototypes toward production and deployment.

    I still see EVs as the core business for years. Robotics needs to prove real orders, scalable production, lower costs & recurring revenue before investors should assign a major valuation premium. For now, I see humanoids more as a valuable growth option than a proven profit engine.

    I choose to lean toward $XPeng Inc.(XPEV)$ for the EV-to-robotics story, while also watching BYD and the broader robotics supply chain. Ultimately, I want to see who can turn Physical AI from an exciting concept into a profitable business first.

    @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_comments @TigerObserver

    Reply
    Report
  • WanEH
    ·09-09 23:33
    我选择A。人形机器人依赖的自动驾驶视觉算法(如 BEV+Transformer 算法)、车载端侧大模型、高算力芯片(如英伟达、地平线平台)以及动力电池管理系统(BMS),与现代智能电动汽车的核心技术重合度高达 80% 以上。中国以小鹏、蔚来、比亚迪、广汽为代表的汽车巨头正在倾其资源全力复制并超越这一路径。
    Reply
    Report
  • Jerry Lam
    ·09-09 21:39
    我会选 C:现在还太早,商业化和盈利能力仍然需要验证,但如果一定要挑一家“电动车→机器人”逻辑最强的,我会先看 小鹏。
    小鹏的优势在于,它本身就在做 自动驾驶、AI感知、控制系统、智能制造,这些能力和人形机器人确实有不少共通点。现在机器人已经从展示阶段往生产线和实际部署推进,这比单纯发布概念更进一步。
    但我暂时不会因为“机器人第二增长曲线”就直接给汽车股大幅加估值。真正重要的是接下来能不能看到 真实订单、量产成本、售价、部署数量,以及机器人业务什么时候开始贡献收入和毛利。如果这些数据迟迟出不来,机器人依然只是估值故事。
    从投资角度看,我其实更喜欢 D:机器人供应链。因为不管最后是小鹏、比亚迪还是其他厂商胜出,执行器、减速器、传感器、电机、芯片这些核心零部件都可能共同受益。
    一句话:汽车公司会不会做机器人不是关键,关键是机器人什么时候从“会走路”变成“会赚钱”;在那之前,我更愿意看供应链,而不是只买故事。
    Reply
    Report
  • 4M65
    ·09-09 21:18
    C

    I'm truly skeptical on the capability notwithstanding it's impending launch. The technology will need to up it's game to make human robot truly replacing many tasks ahead. [Spurting]

    Reply
    Report
  • 苏36
    ·09-09 21:08
    I would pick XPeng as the most interesting EV-to-humanoid robotics story, but the bigger opportunity may be the technology crossover itself.

    XPeng’s advantage is not simply having a humanoid prototype. Its experience in intelligent driving, AI, sensors, batteries, electric motors and automated manufacturing gives it a potential foundation for scaling robots.

    That said, investors should separate robot demonstrations from commercial reality. The real milestones are production volume, customer orders, pricing, unit economics and recurring revenue.

    If XPeng can prove that its IRON humanoid can move from the factory floor to profitable mass deployment, the market may stop valuing it purely as an automaker and start viewing it as a Physical AI company.

    That valuation shift could be far more important than the robot itself.

    @TigerObserver [胜利]

    Reply
    Report
  • highhand
    ·09-09 21:46
    yes. AI and robots are taking over the world
    Reply
    Report