Samsung Makes $80B in a Quarter — But the Stock Barely Moves. Has the Best Part of the Memory Cycle
Samsung just delivered a set of numbers that look almost unreal. For Q3 2026, the company expects revenue of about KRW 195 trillion and operating profit of roughly KRW 107.4 trillion, or around $80.2 billion, up about 783% year over year. The main driver is still AI: HBM, traditional DRAM and NAND are all benefiting from tight supply, giving memory makers exceptional pricing power.
What is more interesting is the market reaction. Despite the record-level profit, Samsung shares barely moved and remain well below their June high. That suggests investors are no longer asking, “How much can Samsung earn this quarter?” The question has shifted to: How long can these margins last?
That is now the key debate across the memory sector. Demand is still strong. AI servers continue to absorb HBM, server DRAM and enterprise SSD capacity, and pricing remains firm. But the rate of price increases is starting to slow. DRAM pricing rose sharply earlier in the year, while current expectations point to much smaller gains in the fourth quarter. In a cyclical industry, that matters because stocks often peak before earnings do. The market usually starts discounting the slowdown long before profits actually fall.
Samsung’s own business mix also shows how unusual this cycle has become. Memory is generating enormous profits, while other parts of the company face higher component costs and weaker economics. In other words, the current earnings boom is highly dependent on memory pricing remaining unusually strong.
This is also why the story connects directly with the recent debate around Michael Burry shorting Micron and Toshiba expanding HDD capacity. AI demand is real, but investors are increasingly looking beyond the next quarter and asking what happens in 2027 and 2028. Will today’s high margins attract enough new capacity to change the supply picture? Will Chinese memory makers keep expanding? Will hyperscalers push back on prices as memory takes a larger share of data-center CapEx?
Tiger View
Tiger thinks it is still too early to call the top of the memory cycle because orders, pricing and AI demand have not clearly rolled over.
But Samsung’s market reaction is important.
The market is no longer willing to reward memory companies simply because profits hit another record. Investors now want to know whether those profits are sustainable.
The next phase of the memory trade may therefore be much harder. Earlier, the only question was whether supply was tight. Now investors also need to judge how long the shortage lasts, whether pricing momentum is slowing, and when new capacity comes online.
Tiger would watch three signals next: whether DRAM and HBM price increases continue to slow, how quickly Samsung, SK hynix, Micron and Chinese suppliers add capacity, and whether hyperscalers begin optimizing memory configurations or pushing harder on long-term pricing.
If the cycle looks like:
Demand keeps growing → prices keep rising → new supply is absorbed quickly,
then this memory upcycle may last much longer than a traditional cycle.
But if it becomes:
Price growth slows → supply expands → customers push back → margins peak,
then the best period for the stocks may end before the best period for earnings does.
Samsung’s latest quarter may be one of the first signs that investors are shifting from asking:
“How high can profits go?”
to:
“How long can these profits stay this high?”
Related Stocks
$Micron Technology(MU)$
Watch: HBM orders, DRAM pricing and management’s view on 2027 supply and demand.
$SK hynix(SKHY)$
Watch: whether HBM growth remains strong enough to offset broader memory-cycle risks.
$SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$
Watch: enterprise SSD demand and whether NAND supply becomes looser earlier than DRAM.
$Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.(SSNLF)$
Watch: memory margins, HBM shipments and management commentary on 2027 pricing and capacity.
Today’s Poll
Samsung just posted roughly $80B in quarterly operating profit. Where do you think the memory cycle is now?
① AI demand is still accelerating — profits can go even higher
② Earnings are still strong, but the best growth rate is behind us
③ DRAM/HBM can stay strong, while NAND may peak first
④ Wait for actual pricing weakness before calling the cycle over
For market discussion only. This is not investment advice. Markets involve risk, and investment decisions should be made carefully.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
For me, the key question is how sustainable these margins are. I will watch DRAM/HBM pricing, new capacity and whether hyperscalers push harder on costs. In a cyclical industry, stocks can peak before earnings do.
I am not calling the cycle over yet because AI infrastructure demand remains strong. However, I would stay selective rather than chase record earnings. If demand keeps outpacing supply, the cycle could last much longer.
@Tiger_comments @Marktomarket @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_SG
Samsung’s 783% profit surge proves how powerful the AI memory cycle has become. HBM demand remains strong, while server DRAM and enterprise SSDs continue benefiting from hyperscaler spending. But investors should distinguish record earnings from accelerating earnings.
Memory is cyclical. Extraordinary margins eventually attract new capacity from Samsung, SK hynix, Micron and Chinese suppliers. If supply catches up faster than demand, pricing power can weaken before AI demand actually slows.
That is why Samsung’s muted stock reaction matters. The market is looking beyond Q3 profits and asking whether these margins can survive into 2027.
I choose ②. I’m not calling the memory cycle over, but the easiest part of the trade may be behind us. The next catalyst is whether pricing power survives rising supply.
@Tiger_comments