This is an educational piece. When it comes to stock investment, I always keep an eye out for the cup-and-handle pattern. It's one of my favourite and most reliable patterns. Cup and handle pattern A cup-and-handle pattern is a bullish continuation pattern where the price forms a rounded "cup" followed by a smaller consolidation or "handle." Once the price breaks above the resistance at the rim of the cup, it typically signals strong bullish momentum with the potential for a significant upward move. AAPL cup and handle pattern How to Measure the Target Price of a Cup-and-Handle Pattern: Calculation of cup and handle target price Measure the Depth of the Cup: Find the distance between the lowest point of the cup and the breakout level (rim of the cup). In the attached chart:Breakout level

$SGX(S68.SI)$ S68 $SGX(S68.SI)$ on 21st Oct '24, S68 reached the Current High of 11.71 & started a correction move till date. Est. 4 weeks till last Friday 15 Nov'24 closed. I decided to add-on position as observed retested 11++zone for a while and MAs are slowly doing it's work [Bless]  [Bless]  IF the lines drawn are correct, should be nearer to a Breakout soon 😉[Bless]  . Let's observed next week Price actions 😉😁. Good Luck 🍀🤞

Earnings Calendar (26Aug24) Q3/2024 starts and a few earnings are coming in the coming week. There are a few earnings of interest in the coming week, namely NVIDIA, Salesforce, CrowdStrike and HP. Let us look at Salesforce’s earnings. Salesforce has been ranging sideways since June 2024. The stock price has risen 28.46% compared to a year ago. Observations about Salesforce’s recent performances: Revenue grew from $5.37 billion in 2015 to $34.8 billion in 2024 The operating profit started with a loss of $146 million in 2015 and it became $5.99 billion in 2024. gross profit margin fluctuates at 74.2% over the 10-year median margin. The PE of the stock stands at 45.8 The 10-year medium margin of free cash flow (FCF) stands at 21% The earnings per share (EPS) started with a -$0.42 in 2015 and

Buying stocks at historical high prices can be risky and may not be wise for everyone. Here are some points to consider: 1. Limited upside: If a stock is already at an all-time high, there may be limited room for growth. 2. Overvaluation: Stocks trading at historical highs may be overvalued, meaning their prices are not justified by their earnings or fundamentals. 3. Increased volatility: Stocks at highs can be more volatile, and a small correction can result in significant losses. 4. No margin of safety: Buying at highs leaves little room for error, and a slight decline can lead to losses. However, some investors may still consider buying stocks at historical highs if: 1. Fundamentals are strong: If the company's financials, management, and industry trends are robust, the stock may contin

Jurrien Timer is the director of global macro in Fidelity's Global Asset Allocation Division, specializing in global macro strategy and active asset allocation. He joined Fidelity in 1995 as a technical research analyst.Key takeawaysWhile the current bull market is aging, and may be in its seventh inning, I believe it still has some room to run and that investors still have time on their side.So far, this year has closely tracked a historical pattern of strong returns in the fourth year of a presidential cycle.Rising earnings and the Fed's easing bias may also provide support for the market in the face of the headwinds of high inflation and rates.I believe the coming years could bring an end to the current bull super cycle—which might mean a transition from above-average to below-average r

The U.S. stock market $S&P 500(.SPX)$ $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ hit a new high for the 30th time, and the bull market is expected to continue into next year. Do we need to continue to hold stocks firmly? One indicator worth a look>> $Cboe Volatility Index(VIX)$ The $Cboe Volatility Index(VIX)$ index fell below 12 last month—such a trajectory has only occurred a few times since the index was established in 1990.When we see such levels, the market is quiet. But we should not misinterpret this as "calm before the storm." In fact, individual stocks may start to outperform the market from here.To prove this point, I looked at

The recent rebound in April is an example that Chinese stocks can rebound without a rebound in property. Falling property price has been a boon to discretionary spending.- China’s economy is bottoming with some upticks, not stalling - our proprietary cycle indicator shows. Manufacturing investment has made up for the fall in property investment. China’s advantage in export stems from its labor productivity and costs. It won’t disappear and will trigger trade frictions. Geopolitical risks abound. - Excess savings are coming out of bank accounts seeking yields. When confidence improves, they will likely be allocated back to stocks, instead of WMPs. The best plays in this unique cycle have been industrial commodities, instead of stocks still beset by regulatory reforms in domestic market

Holding for long term And you believe in the company future.

Ok let's address all three questions. Is it wise to buy at historical highs? Well if there is a number of tailwinds that lead you to the conclusion that the stock will continue to rally, then yes. But also look at the potential headwinds. At some point you must make the decision to either buy a ticket for the roller coaster and jump on, or just sit at the ticket booth and watch, interviewing people who are on the ride and either regret your decision not to buy a ticket, or rejoice in your decision to stay on the sidelines. Have I brought at historical highs? Yes, most recently $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$. And to date I have no regrets. I brought at $1.08, not many, but now it's over $1.30 in under two weeks or so. Do I regret not buying more? No, whenever

"Should you buy at historical highs?* The answer isn't simple. Consider the opportunity cost: if you don't invest your weekly auto deposit, it's like saving gold coins without earning interest. Unlike some other apps, NZ users lack access to high-yield intermediary funds. Therefore, investing in stocks, even at historical highs, might be a better long-term strategy.

Everyone is a genius in a bull market But wealth is created in a bear market. Bull markets don’t last forever Bear markets don’t last forever Your only job is to prepare for both.

It is never a good time to enter. whether historically high or low. Today is the best time to enter.

Not wise but no choice. lol

Yes if target for mid to long term investment

Investing in stocks at historic highs requires a balanced approach. While historical trends and potential gains offer compelling reasons to invest, the risk of corrections and valuation concerns warrant caution. By carefully assessing your risk tolerance, investment horizon, and conducting thorough research, you can make informed decisions that align with your financial goals. Remember, investing is a long-term game, and staying focused on your objectives can help you navigate market fluctuations with confidence.

What would my 45 year old self tell my 25 year old self, with regards to the market: 1. Buy and hold index funds, and add to them every year. 2. Buy and hold a basket of the world's leading companies, add on 20%+ dips. 3. Stop active trading. Do that, and the results will be in the top 5%. Less is more, over the long term.

[Cool] As warren buffet once said "Be fearful when others are greedy" and "Be greedy when others are fearful".There is so much opportunities right now in the market because of our everchanging world. Technology advancement will change our lives and the industry. [USD] Right now, technology stocks are rising more than ever. The Magnificient 7 and other tech stocks are the driving factors for the increase in the US stock market. We are now more bullish than ever towards technology and Artificial intelligence.  [Doubt] Are stocks at a historical high? I disagree because we do not know if we can go higher and no one can predict a market crash. However, if you continue to Dollar Cost Average and stick to fundamentals, it will pay off.  [Helpless] We have yet to see