$DBS(D05.SI)$ [Symbol:D05.SI|DBS (D05.SI)]’s proposed Q3 dividend is SGD 0.81 per share , ex-date 2026-11-13 , record date 2026-11-16 , and scheduled payment date 2026-11-24 . It is a proposal, subject to the stated corporate-action process. Bottom line: DBS remains the strongest income proposition among the three locally listed Singapore banks on trailing yield, while distributing a slightly lower share of earnings than UOB (U11.SI) watchlist and OCBC (O39.SI) watchlist . That combination suggests comparatively good dividend coverage—but the absolute SGD-per-share payment is not directly comparable because share counts and payment frequency differ. Bank Latest regular dividend disclosed TTM dividend yield Latest FY payo
$DBS(D05.SI)$ DBS has held up better than OCBC over the latest available roughly three-month window, despite its decline. The latest 60-trading-day data show DBS (D05.SI) watchlist down 5.93% , versus a 10.00% fall for OCBC Bank (O39.SI) watchlist . That is 4.07 percentage points of relative outperformance. Metric DBS OCBC Bank Read-through Latest price, 2026-11-06 SGD 71.20 SGD 27.93 Both below recent highs 60-trading-day change -5.93% -10.00% DBS declined less 52-week high SGD 79.05 SGD 32.57 DBS is 9.93% below its high; OCBC is 14.25% below Position in 52-week range 72.17% 71.31% Both remain in the upper portion of their annual ranges P/E TTM 18.19x 16.04x DBS trades at a 13.4% earnings-multiple premium P/B 2.88x 1.96
For Apple (AAPL) watchlist , the option tape is defensive-to-bearish in the near term , rather than a clean bullish signal. The current chain-level call/put ratio returned is 0.63 , not 0.96: put activity is materially heavier than call activity. If you are seeing 0.96 elsewhere, it likely reflects a different timestamp, expiry set, or calculation method. A 0.96 ratio alone would be broadly balanced with a slight put tilt—not decisively bearish. The largest recent directional trades were concentrated in long-dated put buys on 2026-11-05: 2,000 Jan-2027 $350 puts bought for about US$3.39m premium-equivalent notional. 3,000 Apr-2027 $280 puts bought for about US$1.53m . 1,200 Mar-2027 $320 puts bought for about US$1.06m . These may be outright downside views, but their long tenor and str
$Apple(AAPL)$ A couple of years ago, everyone was piling on Apple for supposedly being behind in AI. Apple just kept doing its thing and never said a word. Look at where things stand now. Love this company.
Your figures signal very elevated expected volatility, with call-side activity tilted bullish—but they do not by themselves imply a reliable bullish direction. IV 152.68%, 78th percentile: Options were pricing volatility above roughly 78% of its historical observations. Converting that annualized IV into a one-standard-deviation daily move gives approximately 9.62% (152.68% ÷ √252). That is exceptionally high for a single day and means option premiums are expensive because the market expects large swings. Call/put ratio 1.48: About 1.48 calls traded for every put, indicating call demand exceeded put demand. This can reflect bullish speculation or call-based hedging, but it is a sentiment/activity signal rather than proof that the ETF will rise. Joint interpretation: The clearest message i
$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ I called the SOXL decline early from the $350s. After Xi left the US with no breakthrough, I said again that there were no more semiconductor catalysts left when SOXL was at $170. Unlike the after-the-fact posters on this board, I'm buying the dip now at $64. The intraday panic feels overdone, and I think we could see a quick reversal by the close or within the week.
No—GRAB’s implied volatility looks elevated in absolute terms, but not unusually elevated versus its own recent history after the Q3 earnings pop. Grab Holdings (GRAB) watchlist reported Q3 results before the US open on 2026-11-03 . The stock closed at US$2.86 immediately before the release, then US$3.12 on the earnings day and US$3.36 the following session—an approximately 17.48% two-session move, calculated from the reported closes. As of 2026-11-05 : 30-day IV: 63.26% — high in absolute terms for a stock option. IV percentile: 50.60% — essentially around the middle of its own trailing IV distribution, rather than near an extreme. IV/HV ratio: 1.25x — implied volatility is 25% above historical realized volatility, so options still embed a volatility premium. Call/put ratio: 2.71 — call
The Great Grab Awakening: From Beatdown Stock to Cash Monster
🌟🌟🌟The market finally woke up and stopped treating $Grab Holdings(GRAB)$ like a forgotten parking ticket. Let's be honest. Before this week, looking at Grab's stock chart felt like watching a slow motion car crash. Grab's stock was brutally battered, losing nearly 33% year todate. Wall Street critics aggressively dismissed it as a growth -at-all-costs cash burner. But while the Bears were busy writing obituaries, 57 million people across Southeast Asia were using the Grab App to move, eat and pay every single day. The fundamental truth did not just catch up with Grab's stock price, it absolutely steamrolled it. Grab's Amazing Turnaround Grab shattered expectations
For NVIDIA (NVDA) watchlist , the latest analyst consensus target is $323.83 per share, based on 56 analysts. Compared with the $200 market price you specified, that is 61.91% above the current price. Analyst target range Versus $200 Low: $180 10% below Mean: $323.83 61.91% above High: $515 157.5% above The rating mix is strongly positive: among 64 analysts, 95.32% are rated Buy or Strong Buy, while 3.13% are Hold and 1.56% are Sell. This signals a bullish consensus, but the wide $180–$515 range also shows substantial disagreement over NVIDIA’s earnings trajectory and valuation. The core variables to monitor are AI-chip demand and margins; a material slowdown in data-center spending or more intense competition could reduce the upside implied by current targets. Information is for refer
The AI Buildout Isn’t Over: Bullish Cases for Nebius and Ouster
Hello everyone! Today i want to share some trading ideas with you! 1 The more definite winners will be: 1. Those who have a diversified portfolio across US, EMEA & APAC 2. Those who have secured capacity capacity. 3. Those who have permits approved $NEBIUS(NBIS)$ answers all three. 2 Another extremely bullish $Ouster Inc.(OUST)$ call: I'm now forecasting ~$345M in revenue in FY27 and then 40% CAGR from there to 2030. That'll give us $950M in revenue in 2030. At 30% EBITDA margins we have $285M in EBITDA. At a 25x EBITDA multiple that'd give us a $7.2B EV. Equity value would be ~$7.6B. At ~5% dilution, we'll end up with a bull case target ~$85. "Everything that moves is
$DBS(D05.SI)$ [ symbol:D05.SI|DBS Group Holdings (D05.SI)] was scheduled to release its 2026Q3 results on 2026-11-05 , but I could not verify a reported EPS figure yet. Therefore, the comparison with the SGD 1.02 consensus cannot currently be confirmed. The available pre-results coverage indicated analysts expected Q3 net profit to decline slightly year on year, but it did not provide a verified actual EPS. Tiger News Information is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice.
$DBS(D05.SI)$ Mostly yes, but not entirely. From the 2026-10-06 peak through 2026-11-03, DBS (D05.SI) watchlist fell from SGD 78.56 to SGD 70.88, a 9.78% decline. Over the same dates, the Straits Times Index (STI) watchlist fell from 5,701.54 to 5,269.29, or 7.58% . That means DBS underperformed the broad market by 2.19 percentage points over the period (calculated relative return gap: −2.19468 pp ). So the STI slide appears to explain the majority of the move, particularly the sharp market-wide sell-off on 2026-10-08 and renewed weakness on 2026-11-02–03, but it does not fully explain DBS’s decline. The additional DBS-specific component likely reflects: Bank-sector profit-taking after recent highs: DBS, OCBC and UOB had all pulled back f
Conditional conclusion: weaker Greater China sales and slower Services growth would make Apple’s FY2027 outlook more dependent on iPhone demand elsewhere and cost control. The current consensus still assumes a solid revenue expansion, but a materially slower profit trajectory—consistent with margin pressure rather than a demand collapse. For Apple (AAPL) watchlist , FY2027 consensus calls for revenue of US$527.1 billion , up 10.1% from FY2026, while EBIT is projected to rise only 3.0% to US$162.8 billion and EPS 5.3% to US$9.46 . The implied EBIT margin falls from 33.01% in FY2026 to 30.89% in FY2027 , a 6.42% relative contraction . That is the central issue: revenue growth is expected to translate less efficiently into earnings.
Apple’s Post-Earnings Low Slips Below Friday’s 334 “Ghost Print” as Greater China Revenue Slumps
Hello everyone! Today i want to share some trading ideas with you! 1 “Then, Monday would be REALLY INTERESTING"! $S&P 500(.SPX)$ Are you entertained? Those MPW Bamboo Scroll followers should reload their short positions near 7620 zone, as predicted in the roadmap. Now, let's see whether the mysterious pattern I found out would fulfill tmrw. 2 $Apple(AAPL)$'s low is 335, very close to the "ghost print" marked last Friday at 334. Also, the black DMA at 328 will be the next target. I believe my "friendly reminder" should have helped you, if you heeded my warning, very timely. $Apple(AAPL)$'s post-earning low is 332
Bottom line: today’s flow is constructive, but it is not yet strong enough to prove durable institutional accumulation. It looks more like a meaningful rebound bid in Coinbase (COIN) watchlist after a sharp selloff, while Morgan Stanley’s cautious revenue/crypto-volume thesis remains a material fundamental overhang. Today’s tape was clearly positive: COIN closed at US$145.45, up 5.53% , with US$1.55 billion in turnover and 10.62 million shares traded. Net inflow was US$41.27 million , equivalent to 2.66% of turnover . Large orders contributed a positive US$13.80 million , which supports the idea that the move was not purely retail-driven. But the flow mix is not decisively “real money” yet: small-order net inflow was larger at US$24.86 million , versus only US$2.61 million from medium
$COIN Could Rally to $220 in 90 Days and $444 by 2028
$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$ long term buy zone is still in effect. $480 target by November 2028 🎯 The weekly bullish structure is still intact, and the upside is significant if support continues to hold. Price has not swept the key support level, and a potential inverse head and shoulders is forming with the right shoulder currently developing. My short-term target is $220 over the next 60 to 90 days, which would be approximately 41% upside from current levels. My longer-term target is $444, the prior swing high, over the next 18 to 24 months. That represents roughly 200% upside. Invalidation: A weekly close below $120, or approximately 20% downside. That gives roughly 2:1 risk-to-reward to the short-term target and 10:1 to the longer-term targe