$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$ 🚨💥📉 LUNR CRASH LANDING: INTUITIVE MACHINES HITS LUNAR GRAVITY, A COSMIC OPPORTUNITY OR STELLAR WRECKAGE?💥📉
$LUNR just nosedived harder than a lunar module with a drunk pilot at the helm, down over 16% to $11.72, triggering a volatility halt as traders ejected like cosmonauts from a burning capsule! 📉 Is this a gravitational pull to scoop up a bargain, or are we staring at space junk drifting into the void? Buckle up, Tiger Traders, let’s dissect this celestial chaos with surgical precision! 🚀💥
💰 MARKET DYNAMICS & CAPITAL ORBIT
• Current Price: $11.72 (-16.94%), Ouch, that’s a lunar crater!
• 52-Week High: $24.95, Once kissed the stars, now eating moon dust.
• 52-Week Low: $3.15, Been to the dark side and back!
• Market Cap: $1.09B, Still a billion-dollar baby, but shrinking fast.
• Turnover Rate: 10.76%, Hot money’s spinning like a rogue asteroid.
• Equity Flow: $86.90M, Liquidity’s there, but the tide’s rushing out.
Follow the capital trail: High turnover screams panic, but $86.90M in flow hints at institutional hands still holding the joystick. Are the smart-money rocket scientists quietly accumulating while retail bails? 🤔
📊 TECHNICAL TELEMETRY & ORBITAL PATTERNS
• Support Zone: $11.47, A fragile lunar surface; breach it, and we’re sub-$10. 🚨
• Resistance Barriers: $13.41, $14.06, Escape velocity needed to break these ceilings.
• RSI: 4.67, Screaming oversold louder than a stranded astronaut! 📉
• MACD: Bearish thrust accelerating, momentum’s got no retro-rockets.
• Moving Averages: 50-day and 200-day in a death spiral, short-term trend’s a black hole.
• Volume Spike: Turnover’s juiced, capitulation or a bottoming signal?
The charts look like a meteor shower hit them. RSI at 4.67 is a statistical anomaly, textbook oversold, but don’t catch a falling knife without a stop-loss shield. If $11.47 holds, we might see a slingshot bounce; if it cracks, brace for a freefall to $9.50. Risk-reward’s tilting bullish for the bold!
ANALYST ORACLE & SENTIMENT RADAR
• Buy: 3, Optimists see a moonshot recovery.
• Hold: 5, Fence-sitters hedging their bets.
• Sell: 4, Pessimists dumping payload fast.
Sentiment’s a mixed bag, bearish tilt, but green shoots linger.
Analysts are split like a cracked lunar lander: Some spy a discounted entry post-IM-1 glory; others fear a cash-burn supernova. Consensus whispers “Hold,” but the $18.00 average price target (per recent chatter) suggests 50% upside if the stars align. High-beta traders, this is your playground!
🚀 COMPETITOR CONSTELLATION & BENCHMARKS
1️⃣ Rocket Lab USA ($RKLB)
• Buy: 7 | Hold: 3 | Sell: 1
• Steady orbit, outperforming LUNR’s crash landing.
2️⃣ Astra Space ($ASTR)
• Buy: 2 | Hold: 4 | Sell: 6
• Fading star, LUNR’s not alone in the turbulence.
3️⃣ Terran Orbital ($LLAP)
• Buy: 5 | Hold: 3 | Sell: 2
• Gaining altitude while LUNR stalls.
$LUNR’s peers are a mixed galaxy: $RKLB’s the golden child, $ASTR’s a cautionary tale, and $LLAP’s holding its own. Intuitive Machines needs a mission win to reclaim its trajectory, competitors aren’t waiting.
🌍 COSMIC TRIVIA & FUNDAMENTAL FUEL ⛽️
• IM-1 Legacy: First U.S. moon landing since Apollo, history books salute, but the market yawns. 🌕🇺🇸
• Odysseus Oops: Tipped over like a drunk rover, data’s streaming, but perfectionists sold off.
• NASA Lifeline: $30M lunar vehicle deal, $4.82B Artemis contract potential, fuel for the long haul?
• Historical High: $24.95 to $11.72, over 50% off, a clearance sale for risk junkies!
Fundamentals flicker with promise: NASA’s backing is a gravitational anchor, but cash burn and execution risks loom like rogue asteroids. IM-2’s March 6 landing could be the catalyst, or the coffin nail.
📢 ANALYST ECHOES & STREET BUZZ
• “IM-1 was a win with an asterisk, markets demand flawless orbits, not crash landings.”
• “Funding’s the oxygen: Secure more contracts, or it’s game over.”
• “$11.72 is a bargain-bin price, volatility’s your friend if you’ve got steel nerves.”
The chatter’s loud: Risk-tolerant bulls see a phoenix rising; bears smell a cash incinerator. Post-mission recoveries historically favour the brave, think $SPCE’s 2021 bounce. Will $LUNR follow suit?
🤔 TIGER TRADERS’ COSMIC DILEMMA
Is $LUNR a deep-space dip to buy with diamond hands, or a black hole sucking capital into oblivion? RSI screams “oversold,” NASA contracts whisper “value,” but the chart’s a horror show. Options flow shows bulls loading Mar-25 $12 calls, conviction or desperation? Your move, rocketeers!
🤖 @TigerGPT, crunch the cosmos: What’s $LUNR’s rebound probability given past post-mission pivots and current oversold metrics?
📢 LIKE, REPOST, FOLLOW FOR ORBITAL EDGE! 🚀📈
I’m your stargazing strategist, sniffing out setups and decoding trends with razor-sharp precision. From lunar dips to galactic breakouts, I deliver actionable plays to fuel your portfolio’s escape velocity. Let’s navigate the markets, stack profits, and soar together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
@Tiger_comments @TigerWire @TigerPicks @TigerStars @Daily_Discussion
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
Intuitive Machines (LUNR) Stock Analysis
Stock Overview:
Stock Name: Intuitive Machines
Stock Code: LUNR
Current Price: $11.29 USD
Support Price: $11.35 USD
Resistance Price: $14.55 USD
Average Cost: $16.66 USD
Analyst Recommendation: 5 buy, 1 hold, 1 underperform
Analyst Target Price: The mean analyst target price is $18.0 USD, with a low estimate of $15.0 USD and a high estimate of $26.0 USD.
Capital Flow:
Total Inflow: $132 million
Total Outflow: $150 million
Big Inflow: $25.06 million
Median Inflow: $13.78 million
Small Inflow: $93.14 million
Big Outflow: $33.35 million
Median Outflow: $18.04 million
Small Outflow: $98.73 million
Earnings and Forecast:
Earnings per Share (EPS) TTM: -$2.79 USD
Earnings per Share (EPS) FY2025 Forecast: -$0.15 USD
Earnings per Share (EPS) FY2026 Forecast: $0.09 USD
Gross Income FY2025 Forecast: $347.56 million USD
Gross Income FY2026 Forecast: $456.03 million USD
EBIT FY2025 Forecast: -$16.73 million USD
EBIT FY2026 Forecast: $12.98 million USD
Financial Ratios:
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio TTM: -4.022
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio LYR: 3.281
Price-to-Sales Ratio TTM: 5.11
Price-to-Book Ratio: -2.10
Return on Assets (ROA): -15.48%
Return on Equity (ROE): Not available
Recent News:
Intuitive Machines Stock Down 15.6% After Live Stream Ends; Company yet to Ascertain Health of Athena Lunar Lander
Intuitive Machines shares down 21% with landing status unclear
Analysis Summary:
Based on the current stock analysis, here are the key points to consider:
The stock price of Intuitive Machines (LUNR) is currently at $11.29 USD, below the support price of $11.35 USD.
The average cost of the stock is $16.66 USD, indicating a potential loss for investors who bought at higher prices.
The analyst target price ranges from $15.0 USD to $26.0 USD, with a mean target price of $18.0 USD.
The stock shows a high level of volatility, with significant capital flow both in and out of the stock.
The company's earnings per share (EPS) have been negative, with a TTM EPS of -$2.79 USD and a forecasted improvement in future years.
The recent news about the company's lunar landing has impacted the stock, leading to a decline in the share price.
The financial ratios such as the price-to-earnings ratio and price-to-sales ratio indicate that the stock is currently undervalued.
Please note that this analysis is for reference purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. The stock market carries inherent risks, and it is important to conduct thorough research and analysis before making any investment decisions.
Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with!
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$
🌚🚀 STARSHIP SPINS OUT, SPACE X’s HIGH-STAKES TEST FLIGHT ENDS IN A COSMIC TUMBLE! 🚀🌚
The Moon isn’t the only celestial body giving aerospace companies a hard time, SpaceX just took a wild ride through the orbital washing machine, and not the kind that ends with a safe landing!
On Thursday, Starship, Elon Musk’s behemoth rocke, spiralled out of control mid-flight, marking yet another high-profile setback in its ambitious push toward deep-space dominance. This is the second consecutive test flight where Starship encountered a fatal problem, and let’s just say, the footage of this one breaking up over the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic was not the soft re-entry SpaceX was hoping for.
As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hit the red button on flight operations at major Florida airports out of caution for “space launch debris,” airline passengers unknowingly found themselves part of Musk’s latest experiment in chaotic orbital disruption. Starship wasn’t just testing the limits of space travel, it was testing the patience of the aviation industry.
Let’s dissect the interstellar fireworks, SpaceX’s philosophy of “fail fast, iterate faster,” and what this means for the future of space travel, commercial launches, and even our favourite space stocks. 🚀🔥
📉 THE STARSHIP FIASCO, FROM AMBITION TO ATMOSPHERIC BREAKUP
The test began as a picture-perfect launch
✅ Super Heavy booster separated cleanly and even landed back in Texas, SpaceX’s launch tower “chopsticks” successfully caught the returning booster. A rare feat in itself
✅ Starship soared into the cosmos, destined for a new benchmark in orbital testing
🚨 Then came minute eight
🛑 Multiple Raptor engines failed, and suddenly, the world’s most powerful rocket was no longer under control
🌀 Onboard footage captured a dramatic death spiral, with Starship flipping end over end over the ocean, while mission control grimly confirmed that they had lost contact with the ship
🌠 Cue an unplanned breakup event, otherwise known as “let’s make sure no one’s below this thing”
SpaceX was hoping to deploy four dummy Starlink satellites on this test flight, an important milestone toward proving Starship’s viability for future missions. Instead, what they got was another high-altitude explosion, another FAA-mandated mishap investigation, and yet more viral footage of SpaceX’s signature “rapid unplanned disassembly” (read, it blew up)
🛬 STARSHIP’S HIGH-RISK GAME, HOW SPACE X’S FAILURE-PROOF STRATEGY ACTUALLY INVOLVES FAILING
Unlike traditional aerospace companies (looking at you, Boeing), SpaceX isn’t particularly bothered by exploding rockets, in fact, their entire strategy is built around learning from failure at scale
🔥 The Musk Doctrine of Aerospace Innovation
✅ Build it fast, break it faster, iterate in real-time instead of waiting for perfect blueprints
✅ Fly, fail, fix, repeat, every flight adds real-world data instead of relying solely on simulations
✅ Explosions are just expensive lessons, the company isn’t afraid to lose hardware as long as progress happens
In short, SpaceX is doing live prototyping on a planetary scale, and while it makes for spectacular launch failures, it’s also why they’re still lightyears ahead of competitors
But Thursday’s failure marks a pattern
🚀 Flight 7 (Turks & Caicos mishap), Fire inside the ship, comms blackout, catastrophic disintegration
🚀 Flight 8 (This one), Fuel line upgrades, propellant tweaks, still lost control and broke up
SpaceX tweaked the design after Flight 7, adding new fuel delivery systems, extra vents, and a purge system to hedge against leaks. Unfortunately, none of that mattered when the engines themselves started failing mid-orbit
This means there are still major unknowns about Starship’s stability and ability to re-enter safely. In other words
💀 Right now, if Starship was carrying people, it would be fatal
📊 IMPACT ON THE SPACE INDUSTRY, WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS & SPACE STOCKS
🛬 FAA vs. SpaceX, Grounding Orders Incoming?
The FAA is now forcing SpaceX into yet another mishap investigation, requiring them to analyse what went wrong before any new launches. And given Musk’s federal-government-antagonising streak, don’t expect this process to be smooth
🔍 Potential regulatory crackdowns ahead? The FAA already had to ground flights in Florida and divert air traffic over the Bahamas. If the agency thinks Starship is becoming a liability to aviation safety, future launches could face heavier restrictions
📈 HOW DOES THIS AFFECT SPACE STOCKS?
🟢 Bullish View
🚀 SpaceX is still far ahead, No other company is flying rockets even remotely as ambitious as Starship
🚀 Starship will eventually work, The failure-fix cycle is exactly how SpaceX got Falcon 9 to 300+ successful landings
🚀 The industry needs Starship, Without it, deep-space missions remain theoretical
🔴 Bearish View
💥 More delays are inevitable, With regulatory scrutiny and technical hurdles, the timeline keeps shifting
💥 Competitors gain time to catch up, While SpaceX struggles, Rocket Lab ($RKLB) and other aerospace firms keep making progress
💥 Public patience wears thin, Investors and regulators may tire of the blow-it-up-first, ask-questions-later approach
Right now, companies like $RKLB, which focuses on delivering actual functional missions, may see short-term investor preference while SpaceX deals with setbacks
🌕 THE BIG PICTURE, WHY SPACE X’S FAILURES STILL MATTER FOR HUMANITY
Despite back-to-back Starship failures, there’s still no question that SpaceX is pushing humanity toward interplanetary travel faster than anyone else
• No company has ever attempted to build a fully reusable, heavy-lift rocket at this scale
• Every failed test is one step closer to perfecting the technology
• This is exactly how Falcon 9 became the most successful orbital rocket in history
The end goal? A ship that can carry 100+ people to Mars, launch Starlink mega-satellites, and eventually replace Falcon 9 entirely
Right now, Starship is a work in progress, but if it succeeds, it will change space travel forever
💡 In short, If you want a smooth ride, take a plane. If you want to make history, you’ve got to survive a few explosions
🤔 WHAT DO YOU THINK, TIGER TRADERS?
🌠 Is SpaceX’s “fail fast” approach the only way to innovate in space, or is it time for a more measured strategy?
📊 Are these setbacks just speed bumps, or do they open the door for competitors like $RKLB to steal the spotlight?
🚀 Would you buy SpaceX stock if they ever went public, or do you prefer more established aerospace plays?
🤖 TigerGPT, what’s the probability of Starship’s success based on historical aerospace innovation cycles?
📢 Please Like, Repost, and Follow me for sharp setups, stock trends, and actionable insights! 🚀📈 I’m all about spotting the next movers and sharing strategies that deliver results! Let’s trade smarter and grow together! 🍀🍀🍀
Happy trading ahead! Cheers BC 💰📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?