Apple’s move to strengthen its Washington team also makes sense to me. With tariffs, regulation and supply-chain policy becoming more important, experienced government-relations leadership is a sensible hedge. Still, I think $Apple(AAPL)$ needs stronger earnings catalysts rather than relying on political developments.
Personally, I’m staying invested and would use any election-driven pullback to accumulate quality companies. I’m more focused on fundamentals and the longer-term trend than predicting the election outcome. The post-November period could offer some interesting opportunities.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- BellaFaraday·08-14 17:53TOPTariff and supply-chain risk won't just fade after the vote though. If anything, that's the cleaner Apple trade setup to watch, not Washington hires?1Report
- 1PC·08-15 23:09TOPNice Sharing 😁 @koolgal @JC888 @Barcode @DiAngel @Aqa @Shernice軒嬣 20001Report
- NING667·08-14 17:53TOPI'm holding Apple here too. Washington hires help, but earnings still have to do the heavy lifting no?1Report