To The Moon

$TLT 20260724 93.0 CALL$ Set up a covered call for income while waiting for price recovery

$IREN 20260605 45.0 PUT$ Expired worthless, just like my life. Am still looking at 52 to 48 to be the first levels of support to hold, which has multiple levels of convergence of indicators (200day MA, 20week MA and the top of the weekly Ichimoku cloud).  Usually having multiple confluences of support levels on a higher timeframe might signal a stronger support level but that being said it's always just a recommendation and Mr Market will do whatever he wants and slice through it like a hot knife through thick butter when the drawdown comes. 

$PLTR 20260605 124.0 PUT$ PLTR cash secured put expired worthless, full premium collected 

$OKLO 20260605 80.0 CALL$ OKLO strangled calls expired worthless, full premium collected 

Replying to @Options777:what do you think? @Tiger_comments @ECLC @bluesea520 @Strategium Holdings On my hit list [Cool] $Alphabet(GOOG)$ $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $NEBIUS(NBIS)$ $Vertiv Holdings LLC(VRT)$ //@Options777:To answer the immedi

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$ 昨晚經歷了較大的回調,不過有權利便有義務,買槓杆產品便有這樣風險,我相信捱價應不會過得太久,來緊還有些巨無霸上市,期待TQQQ再創高峰,歷史給我信心. 送禮自用兩皆宜的TQQQ (D45 發掘隱性股皇的心路歷程) 一個誤打誤撞發現複利原子彈的真實故事 送禮自用兩皆宜的TQQQ (D45 發掘隱性股皇的心路歷程) ——一個誤打誤撞發現複利原子彈的真實故事 前言：從未令我虧損的「常勝將軍」 買賣股票賺蝕乃是兵家常事，惟有一隻美國上市的 TQQQ（納斯達克100三倍槓桿ETF） 從未令我虧損一分一毫。 每次買入，不是能夠匆匆獲利，便是瞬間「坐艇」。坐得久不久，全憑當時時局。我很幸運，蟹貨多數是捱一陣子便修復失地，甚至有過之而無不及。 矛盾：我為何總是患得患失？ 然而，對於這隻「常勝將軍」，我卻欠缺勇氣持貨下去。 因為坊間一眾專家、大大小小KOL，一面倒地提出忠告： - 「此股不宜久留」 - 「手續費不便宜」 - 「波幅極大」 - 「交投淡靜時會侵蝕你本金」 - 「大跌時會令你嘔突」 這些惡言深入腦海，每次買賣我都患得患失，總覺得手中的計時炸彈隨時會爆，炸到自己粉身碎骨。 轉折：我決定自己「睇真啲」 冷靜下來後，我想：專家們說到TQQQ有如洪水猛獸、十惡不赦，一定有其原因。他們必定有些致命觀點未說出來。 於是我決定以「睇真啲」精神，從源頭出發。 怎知道——有重大發現。 真相（一）：專家沒有說謊，但他們沒有說全部 經我細心研究，專家們所舉的例子是千真萬確的——TQQQ在某些大跌市中確實跌得很慘。 但是，這是單一事件。 他們以一件單一大跌市，就作出「TQQQ不適宜長揸」的結論，卻沒有提出TQQQ一飛沖天的例子，也沒有完整說明TQQ

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$ 昨晚經歷了較大的回調,不過有權利便有義務,買槓杆產品便有這樣風險,我相信捱價應不會過得太久,來緊還有些巨無霸上市,期待TQQQ再創高峰,歷史給我信心. SpaceX上市在即 TQQQ破百在望 去年11月TQQQ完成2:1拆股，拆股後股價約50.25美元，猶如輕裝上陣的遠航船，自此開啟穩步上行之路。至上週五（5月1日）收市，價格已達65.16美元，短短數月漲幅近三成，強勢姿態盡顯，為年內衝刺百元關口築牢根基。 納指100今年5月起實施的新規，恰似為SpaceX量身訂製的「綠色通道」。舊規下新股需等待數月纔有機會納入指數，如今「快速准入」機制落地，並免除盈利要求,SpaceX上市後最快15個交易日即可光速躋身納指100。作為萬億級硬科技巨頭，SpaceX入指後將佔據核心權重，與特斯拉形成「雙星聯動」，成為拉動納指100上行的雙引擎。 更關鍵的是，SpaceX此次IPO發行量不足10%，流通籌碼稀缺如沙漠甘泉。全球追蹤納指100的被動基金規模超3萬億美元，入指後剛性買盤將瘋狂湧入，稀缺籌碼疊加巨額資金搶籌，股價易漲難跌，甚至大概率被推高溢價。而TQQQ作為納指100三倍槓桿ETF，將直接放大這波上漲紅利，成為最大受益者之一。 2026年下半年，特斯拉與SpaceX必將成為全球資本目光的焦點。SpaceX的商業航天霸主地位、特斯拉的新能源龍頭勢能，將持續推升納指100走強。TQQQ在拆股後流動性提升、上漲動能充沛，疊加SpaceX上市帶來的指數級催化，年內突破100美元大關並非奢望，甚至大概率迎來再次拆股，延續強者恆強的行情。 8 

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$  離經叛道：開枝散葉百子千孫論TQQQ 常言道：「冇比較，冇傷害。」但很多時候，傷害並非來自你自己想比較，而是旁人主動將你與同儕比較，然後丟下一句：「你冇得同人比。」心靈便無端受創。 在ETF的世界裡，QQQ與TQQQ便經常被拿來對比。兩者同樣追蹤納斯達克100指數，投資的是美國百大非金融龍頭企業（如Apple、NVIDIA等）。差別在於：大哥QQQ不使用槓桿，細佬TQQQ則主打「單日報酬率三倍放大」的效果。 市場對兩者的評價向來涇渭分明：大哥斯斯文文、穩健規矩，開支比率僅0.18%，是投資人眼中「可以託付終身的伴侶」；細佬則被貼上「高風險、好高騖遠」的標籤，開支比率高達0.82%，加上三倍槓桿的特性，坊間普遍認為它「只適合短炒，長期持有必死無疑」——畢竟槓桿ETF在盤整或下跌時的「複利損耗」，向來被視為投資人的惡夢。 然而，做研究最忌輕信表象。我決定拋開常見的偏見，回頭檢視兩者的真實歷史表現。 結果發現，兩者都曾歷經劇烈波動，TQQQ的走勢更是誇張得多。但那些被形容為「食人唔吐骨」的槓桿損耗，並未讓TQQQ消失在市場中；相反，它不斷「開枝散葉」——上市至今十六年間，已累計完成八次拆股，其中七次為2:1拆股、一次為3:1拆股。反觀大哥QQQ，自上市以來僅在隔年做過一次2:1拆股，其後再無動作。 TQQQ十六年八次拆股，平均每兩年一次。市場普遍認為，ETF拆股的核心條件之一，是股價突破管理層設定的門檻（坊間常見為100美元）。換言之，TQQQ平均每兩年股價便會翻倍一次，才能觸發拆股條件。這個發現讓我有如哥倫布發現新大陸般興奮——畢竟坊間對TQQQ的討論，幾乎從未提及這一關鍵細節。 為了驗證這個推論，我進一步還原

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$  離經叛道：開枝散葉百子千孫論TQQQ 常言道：「冇比較，冇傷害。」但很多時候，傷害並非來自你自己想比較，而是旁人主動將你與同儕比較，然後丟下一句：「你冇得同人比。」心靈便無端受創。 在ETF的世界裡，QQQ與TQQQ便經常被拿來對比。兩者同樣追蹤納斯達克100指數，投資的是美國百大非金融龍頭企業（如Apple、NVIDIA等）。差別在於：大哥QQQ不使用槓桿，細佬TQQQ則主打「單日報酬率三倍放大」的效果。 市場對兩者的評價向來涇渭分明：大哥斯斯文文、穩健規矩，開支比率僅0.18%，是投資人眼中「可以託付終身的伴侶」；細佬則被貼上「高風險、好高騖遠」的標籤，開支比率高達0.82%，加上三倍槓桿的特性，坊間普遍認為它「只適合短炒，長期持有必死無疑」——畢竟槓桿ETF在盤整或下跌時的「複利損耗」，向來被視為投資人的惡夢。 然而，做研究最忌輕信表象。我決定拋開常見的偏見，回頭檢視兩者的真實歷史表現。 結果發現，兩者都曾歷經劇烈波動，TQQQ的走勢更是誇張得多。但那些被形容為「食人唔吐骨」的槓桿損耗，並未讓TQQQ消失在市場中；相反，它不斷「開枝散葉」——上市至今十六年間，已累計完成八次拆股，其中七次為2:1拆股、一次為3:1拆股。反觀大哥QQQ，自上市以來僅在隔年做過一次2:1拆股，其後再無動作。 TQQQ十六年八次拆股，平均每兩年一次。市場普遍認為，ETF拆股的核心條件之一，是股價突破管理層設定的門檻（坊間常見為100美元）。換言之，TQQQ平均每兩年股價便會翻倍一次，才能觸發拆股條件。這個發現讓我有如哥倫布發現新大陸般興奮——畢竟坊間對TQQQ的討論，幾乎從未提及這一關鍵細節。 為了驗證這個推論，我進一步還原

As a seasoned investor , I have learned that markets rarely hand out clear signals. But every so often, the tape speaks with unmistakable clarity. We are witnessing a major shift in risk right now. The Nasdaq dropped 4.77% in a single session while the VIX the market’s premier fear gauge—surged nearly 40%. At the same time, bonds faced heavy selling pressure, driving yields higher and dragging precious metals below their key 200-day moving averages. This is not random noise. It is a coordinated repricing of risk across asset classes, and it suggests that many of the comfortable assumptions investors have relied upon for years are coming unhinged. What the Numbers Are Telling A nearly 5% drubbing in the Nasdaq, home to the world's most expensive growth stocks, paired with a violent VIX spik

AI Stocks Are Crashing, but Smart Money Is Buying Nvidia and TSM U.S. technology stocks came under heavy pressure on Friday as stronger-than-expected nonfarm payrolls data forced investors to reassess the Federal Reserve's policy outlook. Expectations for higher-for-longer interest rates intensified, sending growth stocks sharply lower. The $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$   fell over 4% intraday, while the $Philadelphia Semiconductor Index(SOX)$   plunged over 10%, making AI infrastructure names among the hardest-hit stocks in the market. As of publication, $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ 

Definitely won’t get on board next week. The cash burn is scary. The storyline is great but sounds close to fantasy. Humans on mars? Scientists have not even found water that is essential for life and only selected fit astronauts go there. I think it will take a good number of years before even humans can go there for a tour and this will be limited to the few rich ones- how to rapidly turn profitable? How to support a lunar factory unless it is not manned by any humans or water is transported to mars too which is costly. AI data centres in orbit sounds maybe like a more feasible short term goal. Otherwise this stock sounds like for anyone who is willing to pay a part of Elon’s dream which can be very speculative. I prefer to await for better clarity on its prospects and potential for real

A $1.3T wipeout grabs headlines, but it doesn't automatically mean the AI story is broken. The market had become extremely crowded, valuations were stretched, and stronger-than-expected jobs data reduced hopes for near-term rate cuts. That combination was enough to trigger a sharp repricing. The key question is whether AI demand is slowing. So far, hyperscaler capex, data centre buildouts, and AI infrastructure spending remain intact. If earnings and spending plans hold up, this may prove to be a valuation reset rather than the start of a fundamental downturn. As for the SpaceX IPO, capital could rotate temporarily, but long-term liquidity is driven far more by monetary policy and corporate earnings than a single listing. Personally, I would be far more interested in buying quality names a

I'd be careful treating Rocket Lab or AST SpaceMobile as "SpaceX proxies". The bull case is straightforward: a successful SpaceX IPO could bring massive attention and fresh capital into the space sector, lifting related names through sentiment alone. That's what many traders are betting on. The bear case is that expectations may already be priced in. If investors can finally buy SpaceX directly, capital could rotate out of RKLB, ASTS, Virgin Galactic and Redwire rather than into them. History is full of "sell-the-news" events following highly anticipated listings. Between the two, RKLB has a clearer business model today with launch services, spacecraft systems, and growing government contracts. ASTS offers larger potential upside if its direct-to-cell network succeeds, but execution risk r

Tech’s $160 Billion Liquidity Vacuum: Is the AI Trade Dead or Just Reloading? "Are my tech stocks fundamentally broken?" "Is the great AI supercycle finally over?" "Did I just buy the exact top of the market?" These are the panicked questions flooding the community over the last 48 hours. Recently, the market experienced a massive, structural capital event: Google announced an $84.5 billion capital raise, and right on its heels, SpaceX stepped in to raise another $75 billion. Both offerings were massively oversubscribed. The immediate aftermath? A violent, across-the-board sell-off in AI, power, optical networking, and data center stocks. But before you hit the panic sell button, let's unpack the actual mechanics of this market rotation. 1️⃣ The Great $160 Billion Liquidity Vacuum When ret

Friday’s Beta-Driven Bloodbath: Are We Reliving 2022 or Just Shaking Out Weak Hands? Friday delivered a sudden, brutal shift in market sentiment, functioning as a textbook "Beta-driven sell-off" that caught aggressive momentum traders completely off guard. The highest-flying tech and AI names took the deepest cuts, while low-beta, defensive sectors showed relative resilience. Triggered by an unexpectedly hot non-farm payrolls report, the market violently re-priced the macroeconomic landscape, suddenly forcing the dreaded threat of end-of-year rate hikes back into active discussion. Before hitting the panic button and liquidating your portfolio, we need to separate structural, systemic risk from a routine institutional liquidity flush. 1️⃣ The Ghost of 2022 vs. A Temporary Policy Micro-Adju

SpaceX’s $1.8 Trillion Gravity Well: Is the Space Stock Sector About to Crash or Ignite? The gravitational pull of the upcoming SpaceX IPO is violently disrupting the entire space-proxy sector. As SpaceX prepares for a listing that could value it at a staggering $1.8 trillion, retail darlings like Rocket Lab (RKLB), AST SpaceMobile (ASTS), and Virgin Galactic (SPCE) have been slammed with aggressive profit-taking. But with prominent short-seller Steve Eisman publicly trashing SpaceX’s valuation and rumors swirling of institutional short positioning, traders are facing a massive directional dilemma: is the space sector a bubble ready to burst, or is this the ultimate shakeout before the next tech supercycle? ### 1️⃣ The "Black Hole" Liquidity Effect When a mega-unicorn like SpaceX hits the