SpaceX S-1 Decoded: Three Segments, What Businesses Are You Investing?

Tiger_comments
05-21 20:12

SpaceX filed its S-1. Road show June 5, $SpaceX(SPCX)$ target valuation $1.8 trillion. The filing runs hundreds of pages. The key question: which division makes money, which loses money, and which burns the most cash?

SpaceX reports three segments: Space (launch), Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. These aren't parallel — they're vertical: rockets lower the cost of reaching orbit → satellites turn that capability into a billable subscription network → AI attempts to extend the platform into compute and real-time intelligence.

2025 Segment Summary & Annual Revenue Breakdown

The read: Starlink makes money (38.8% op margin). Launch loses money (-16.1%). AI burns the most cash (-198.5% op margin + $12.7B CapEx). Launch revenue barely grew. The growth engine is Starlink.

In 2025, Connectivity was 61% of revenue growing +49.8%.

Space was just 21.9% and grew only +7.6% — with Launch Services revenue actually -0.3% YoY. SpaceX is a global satellite communications platform that uses cheap rockets as a supply chain advantage. Falcon's value isn't the launch revenue it generates directly — it's making every Starlink constellation expansion faster and cheaper than any competitor. Starlink at 10.3M subscribers across 164 countries, with Consumer and Enterprise both growing 49–51%, is the real engine.



The AI division: $12.7B in CapEx for a -198.5% operating margin

In 2025, the AI segment spent $12.7B in CapEx — more than Space ($3.8B) and Connectivity ($4.2B) combined. For every $1 of AI revenue generated, SpaceX spent $4 in CapEx and lost $2 at the operating level.

The AI segment covers X platform advertising, AI Solutions & Infrastructure, Grok, and xAI. The thesis is compelling: X's real-time data + Grok's models + SpaceX's orbital access + Starlink's global coverage. The challenge is that compelling logic doesn't automatically become revenue. How much of the $1.8T valuation belongs to this division is the central question each investor needs to answer.


Free cash flow -$14B — what is the IPO actually for?

2025: Operating CF $6.8B, CapEx $20.7B, FCF approximately -$14.0B.

Q1 2026: Operating CF $1.0B, CapEx $10.1B, FCF approximately -$9.1B.

Operating cash flow is trending upward (Starlink is real). CapEx is expanding faster. The IPO is fuel for AI infrastructure and Starship scaling — not a sign the core business needs saving. Musk holds approximately 42% of the company; SpaceX needs to hit $1.6T in valuation for him to become the world's first trillionaire.

How do you price $SPCX$?

Which segment do you think the $1.8T valuation is primarily pricing — Starlink, Starship, or the AI thesis

Is there a path for $SPCX$ to become a satellite-era $AMZN$?

AI burned $12.7B in CapEx and lost $6.4B — is that the price of building the next Starlink, or is it dragging down SpaceX's cash cow?

Join our SpaceX event and comment to win tiger coins~

# SpaceX S-1 Filed: Too Late to Rush Into Space Stocks Now?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（17）

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Shyon
    ·05-21 23:06
    TOP
    SpaceX’s S-1 confirms Starlink is the real engine. Connectivity now drives over 60% of revenue with strong margins, while Launch mainly supports cheaper and faster satellite expansion. SpaceX increasingly looks like a global communications platform, not just a rocket company.

    The AI division is the biggest question mark. Losing billions with huge CapEx is risky, but Musk is clearly betting on combining X, Grok, Starlink, and orbital infrastructure into one ecosystem. Whether that deserves a large part of the $1.8T valuation is what investors need to decide.

    I think today’s valuation is mostly pricing Starlink, while Starship and AI are the long-term upside. If both execute well, SpaceX could become the satellite-era version of Amazon. The IPO also feels more like a funding round for future expansion rather than a rescue for the core business.

    @Tiger_SG @TigerClub @TigerStars @Tiger_comments

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • TimothyX
    ·05-21 23:51
    TOP
    The read: Starlink makes money (38.8% op margin). Launch loses money (-16.1%). AI burns the most cash (-198.5% op margin + $12.7B CapEx). Launch revenue barely grew. The growth engine is Starlink.
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·13:18
    所以我会这样看：如果按成熟企业估值，1.8T大部分应该属于Starlink；如果按未来梦想估值，那一半以上其实是在赌AI和Starship能成为下一个AWS级别业务。对我来说，SpaceX更像“卫星时代的亚马逊”——现在赚钱的是电商（Starlink），烧钱的是云（AI/Starship）。关键问题是：这些亏损部门，未来能不能长成第二个现金牛，而不是长期拖累。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·13:18
    但市场给1.8T估值，显然不只是算Starlink的账，更大部分是在提前给AI“梦想税”。AI部门2025年烧掉127亿美元资本支出，营业利润率竟然是-198.5%，每赚1美元收入，就要花4美元CAPEX。这基本上还是“烧钱讲故事”阶段。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·13:18
    真正的发动机其实是Starlink。连通性业务占总收入61%，增长接近50%，营业利润率38.8%，而且已经覆盖164个国家、超过千万用户。说白了，猎鹰火箭最大的价值不是卖发射服务，而是让Starlink卫星可以比竞争对手更快、更便宜地上天，形成一种别人复制不了的成本优势。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·13:18
    很多人一直把SpaceX理解成“火箭公司”，但2025年的数字已经说明，发射业务更像是成本中心。Launch营业利润率-16.1%，收入增长只有7.6%，甚至实际发射收入同比还倒退0.3%。换句话说，火箭本身不是印钞机，它更像京东物流——自己赚钱有限，但能支撑整个生态。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·13:18
    如果单看“1.8万亿美元估值”，很多人会觉得SpaceX贵得离谱，但读完S-1后，我反而觉得市场真正买单的，并不是火箭，而是Starlink现金流+AI想象力。先讲结论：现在赚钱的是Starlink，亏钱的是Launch，最烧钱的是AI。
    Reply
    Report
  • Hectorist
    ·05:35
    Thorough insight into the way SpaceX relies on the space communication network (Starlink) and AI computing in technical and financial forms to build up a project that is much greater than the sum of its parts.

    good research

    Reply
    Report
  • Chrishust
    ·01:29
    1.$SpaceX(SPCX)$ valuation is based on hype and marketing with it’s recent ipo. It is a high valuation of potential future value.
    2. $SpaceX(SPCX)$ is a space focused research and development company with limited revenue potential.
    3. Yes spending capex and writing off capex is a loss which reduces valuation
    Reply
    Report
  • Cadi Poon
    ·05-21 23:48
    SpaceX reports three segments: Space (launch), Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. These aren't parallel — they're vertical: rockets lower the cost of reaching orbit → satellites turn that capability into a billable subscription network → AI attempts to extend the platform into compute and real-time intelligence.
    Reply
    Report
  • 這是甚麼東西
    ·05-21 22:54
    AI CapEx: New Starlink or Cash Cow DragThe 12.7 billion dollar AI CapEx burn and 6.4 billion dollar loss currently act as a drag on the cash-producing Starlink segment, rather than a direct investment in the core constellation. While Starlink achieved profitability through massive consumer adoption, the AI division’s heavy expenditure mimics a high-risk, capital-intensive tech race. This spending redirects resources that could otherwise be used to accelerate orbital broadband growth into speculative, ground-based compute infrastructure.
    Reply
    Report
  • 這是甚麼東西
    ·05-21 22:54
    The Path to a Satellite-Era AMZNA clear path exists for SPCX to replicate the Amazon business model by using heavy infrastructure to monopolise a market and cross-subsidise high-margin services. In this playbook, Starship acts as the low-cost retail delivery network, driving down the cost of orbital mass to eliminate rocket competitors. Starlink operates as the high-volume consumer layer, while the newly integrated AI and space-compute division serves as the satellite-era AWS, capturing high-margin enterprise data workloads directly from orbit.
    Reply
    Report
  • 這是甚麼東西
    ·05-21 22:53
    Drivers of the 1.8T ValuationThe 1.8 trillion dollar valuation is primarily pricing the AI thesis. While Starlink provides the current revenue foundation of 11.4 billion dollars, a valuation near 1.8 trillion dollars represents an unprecedented 94 times 2025 total revenue. This extreme multiple reflects a tech-platform premium driven by the recent xAI merger, rather than a standard aerospace or telecom hardware business. Wall Street is buying into the narrative of space-based data centers and integrated AI compute, treating the physical rocket launches as a subsidised distribution mechanism for intelligence.
    Reply
    Report
  • 這是甚麼東西
    ·05-21 22:53
    How to Price SPCXSPCX cannot be priced using traditional earnings multiples because its core launch and AI segments operate at a net loss while absorbing massive capital. Instead, pricing must rely on a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) methodology. This framework values the launch business on a price-to-sales multiple based on global launch dominance, applies a software-as-a-service (SaaS) subscriber multiple to Starlink cash flows, and values the AI segment as a speculative technology venture based on its high-compute infrastructure capacity.
    Reply
    Report
  • highhand
    ·05-21 21:58
    I will buy after space X goes down after the hype is gone...
    Reply
    Report
  • Dazza2
    ·07:53

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report