If You Were an Ordinary American, Whose Policies Would Be More Beneficial for You?
Due to the current close election race, both parties are adjusting their policies to attract moderate voters.
On key issues like tax cuts, immigration, energy independence, and inflation, there is some consensus. In addition to the consensus, let’s look at their differences in the key issues.
If you were ordinary Americans, whose policies are more beneficial for you?
Tax Cuts:
Harris: Proposes tax cuts for the middle class and small businesses; may raise taxes on the wealthy, emphasizing child and earned income tax credits.
Trump: Advocates for broad tax cuts, extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, potentially lowering corporate tax to 15%.
Inflation:
Harris: Focuses on reducing living costs, particularly in housing and healthcare, but her housing policies may inadvertently raise inflation.
Trump: Aims to combat inflation through increased oil supply and reduced spending, though his tariffs could also raise costs.
Energy:
Harris: Supports clean energy investments but also endorses traditional energy.
Trump: Emphasizes independence from traditional energy and relaxation of environmental regulations.
Trade:
Harris: Selectively imposes tariffs on certain Chinese industries, avoiding consumer impact.
Trump: Advocates for general tariffs, especially on goods from China and Mexico, and may revoke China's most-favored-nation status.
Social Security:
Harris: Supports expanding Social Security benefits and increasing government spending on social programs.
Trump: Advocates for reducing government intervention while maintaining the existing Social Security system.
Border Policy:
Harris: Has taken a tougher stance, supporting enhanced border control to reduce illegal immigration.
Trump: Enforces strict immigration policies, advocating for tougher border measures and potential deportations.
Fiscal Deficit:
Harris: Acknowledges the fiscal deficit but prefers addressing it through increased taxes and cuts in specific areas.
Trump: Proposes reducing government spending, easing regulations, and stimulating economic growth to tackle the deficit.
Do their policies really affect stock market performance?
Election results tend to have short-term impacts on the stock market, but over time, fundamentals prevail.
For example, Trump's 2016 win initially hit renewable energy stocks, but they surged by 383% during his term.
Similarly, Biden's presidency boosted traditional energy stocks, but such movements were largely influenced by external events like the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
As an ordianary American or investor, will you choices be different?
Would you position Trump or Harris Trade early?
Which side do you favor?
Leave your comments and also post to win tiger coins~
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
@LMSunshine @Universe宇宙 @GoodLife99 @rL @HelenJanet @koolgal @Shyon @Aqa @SPACE ROCKET @TigerGPT
As an ordianary American or investor, will you choices be different?
Would you position Trump or Harris Trade early?
Which side do you favor?
Leave your comments and also post to win tiger coins~
I appreciate his approach to combating inflation by increasing oil supply and reducing spending.
I support his strict trade stance, particularly on China and Mexico, because I believe it protects American jobs and industries, even if it means some consumer cost increases. I also agree with maintaining the current Social Security system without extensive government intervention.
Trump's focus on reducing government spending while promoting economic growth resonates with my views on fiscal responsibility, potentially helping to address the deficit. Overall, I see his policies leading to economic growth, and I believe my investment choices reflect these priorities, positioning me to benefit from stability and job creation under his leadership.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerGPT
另一方面，特朗普主张广泛的减税政策，延续减税和就业法案，甚至提议将公司税率降至15%。这对于企业主和高收入人群更具吸引力，因为它鼓励企业投资和扩大就业。然而，对于普通工薪阶层而言，特朗普的政策可能不会带来立竿见影的好处，反而更有利于富人和大企业。此外，削减企业税可能会进一步扩大贫富差距，普通人可能在短期内感受到的减税效果有限。
总体来看，作为普通的美国人，我更倾向于支持哈里斯的政策，因为它更直接地关注中产阶级的利益，并提供更大的税收抵免。
$Invesco Solar ETF(TAN)$ $NextEra(NEE)$ $Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$ $Trump Media & Technology(DJT)$ $Rivian Automotive, Inc.(RIVN)$ $SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF(KRE)$ $Centene(CNC)$
🌟🌟🌟 The Election Impact Playbook for Financials: Harris vs. Trump – Who Deserves Your Vote (and Your Trades)? 🌟🌟🌟
Kia ora Tiger traders!
The 2024 election is shaping up to be a market-moving juggernaut, and if you’re not positioning your trades early, you’re missing out! 💥 With Harris and Trump neck-and-neck, both candidates are adjusting policies to win moderate voters, and the financial sector is on the brink of massive shifts.
But let’s cut to the chase—whether it’s Harris’ focus on clean energy and middle-class tax relief or Trump’s push for traditional energy and deregulation, your portfolio is about to feel the impact. 🏆 Harris may just be the ticket to long-term gains, especially for those of us who value progressive, forward-thinking policies. Let’s dive into how you can trade these election outcomes like a pro!
🏛️ Harris Victory: Clean Energy, Healthcare, and Forward Momentum
If Harris wins, it’s not just about financial gain—her policies represent a progressive shift that benefits ordinary Americans, particularly the middle class. Harris supports clean energy, social security expansion, and affordable healthcare. Her policies aim to empower the average investor, leaving behind the outdated views of Trump and Vance that favor the wealthy and corporations.
This is where your money should be if you believe in long-term, sustainable growth and a future that’s inclusive and equitable 🌱.
🎯 Stocks to Buy (Harris Victory):
• AES, NEE, TAN: As champions of renewable energy, these stocks will see massive growth under Harris’ leadership as she continues to push for clean energy investments.
• AES has already surged 25% YTD, and analysts predict another 10-15% upside if her policies are fully implemented.
• NEE and TAN will see sustained growth as government-backed renewable energy initiatives take the spotlight.
• HCA (HCA Healthcare) and CNC (Centene Corporation): With Harris’ emphasis on expanding healthcare access and supporting social programs, these two healthcare giants will thrive.
• RIVN (Rivian Automotive): Harris’ pro-environment stance means EV manufacturers like Rivian will get a boost through increased government support for electric vehicles.
🏛️ Trump Victory: Old-School Policies and Volatility
If Trump wins, expect a return to the old world of corporate tax cuts, tariffs, and traditional energy dominance. His close ally, Vance, is a reflection of 1950s-era views—ranging from anti-women policies to an economic model that benefits big business over the everyday American.
While this might offer some short-term gains in cyclicals and financials, the overall trajectory of his policies is outdated and unsustainable for modern times.
🎯 Stocks to Buy (Trump Victory):
• DJT, EVR, LAZ, KRE, DFS: These stocks will get a short-term boost from Trump’s deregulation and corporate tax cuts, but at the cost of long-term progress. Financials will surge, but the human cost of these policies is enormous.
🔻 Stocks to Avoid (under Trump):
• NEE, AES, TAN: Clean energy stocks will suffer under Trump’s traditional energy push, further highlighting the backward direction of his policies.
💼 Hedge Fund Strategies: Who’s Betting on What?
Let’s take a look at how the big players are positioning themselves:
Dan Loeb (Third Point):
Loeb’s hedge fund is banking on a Trump win, focusing on cyclicals and financials. His bets align with the traditionalist, corporate-first approach that Trump and Vance represent.
Mark Dowding (RBC BlueBay):
Dowding’s strategy heavily favors interest rates and a stronger U.S. dollar if Trump wins, but these gains will be short-lived as global trade conflicts intensify.
Vineer Bhansali (LongTail Alpha):
Bhansali is betting on market volatility, particularly post-election uncertainty, which he expects to rise under both candidates. However, he sees Harris driving long-term growth in clean energy.
Zachary Kurz (PinnBrook Capital):
Kurz is hedging his bets but acknowledges that financials could see a short-term rally under Trump. Still, he’s cautious, noting the unpredictability of Trump’s policies.
🔮 Harris: The Candidate for Ordinary Americans
Let’s be clear: Harris’ policies are far more beneficial to the average American. From middle-class tax cuts to expanded healthcare and social security, Harris focuses on reducing the cost of living for ordinary people. Meanwhile, Trump’s outdated views, especially when bolstered by Vance’s 1950s rhetoric, simply fail to represent the needs of modern Americans.
Do Their Policies Really Affect Stock Market Performance?
Yes! During Trump’s 2016 win, renewable energy stocks initially dropped, but as the market adjusted, they surged by 383%. Under Harris, expect a far more consistent rise in clean energy, healthcare, and socially responsible sectors. Her policies are progressive, ensuring steady growth rather than short-term bursts.
🧠 Key Question to Tiger Traders
Hey Tiger Traders, with Harris’ focus on clean energy and the middle class, will you be pivoting your portfolio toward these progressive sectors, or are you still hedging with financials?
🧠 Question to TigerGPT
TigerGPT, how do misogynistic policies like those proposed by Trump and Vance affect market sentiment, and what are the long-term risks for sectors dependent on gender diversity and inclusion?
Happy trading ahead. Cheers, BC 🍀
$Invesco Solar ETF(TAN)$ $NextEra(NEE)$ $Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$ $Trump Media & Technology(DJT)$ $Rivian Automotive, Inc.(RIVN)$ $SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF(KRE)$ $Centene(CNC)$
🌟🌟🌟 The Election Impact Playbook for Financials: Harris vs. Trump – Who Deserves Your Vote (and Your Trades)? 🌟🌟🌟
Kia ora Tiger traders!
The 2024 election is shaping up to be a market-moving juggernaut, and if you’re not positioning your trades early, you’re missing out! 💥 With Harris and Trump neck-and-neck, both candidates are adjusting policies to win moderate voters, and the financial sector is on the brink of massive shifts.
But let’s cut to the chase—whether it’s Harris’ focus on clean energy and middle-class tax relief or Trump’s push for traditional energy and deregulation, your portfolio is about to feel the impact. 🏆 Harris may just be the ticket to long-term gains, especially for those of us who value progressive, forward-thinking policies. Let’s dive into how you can trade these election outcomes like a pro!
🏛️ Harris Victory: Clean Energy, Healthcare, and Forward Momentum
If Harris wins, it’s not just about financial gain—her policies represent a progressive shift that benefits ordinary Americans, particularly the middle class. Harris supports clean energy, social security expansion, and affordable healthcare. Her policies aim to empower the average investor, leaving behind the outdated views of Trump and Vance that favor the wealthy and corporations.
This is where your money should be if you believe in long-term, sustainable growth and a future that’s inclusive and equitable 🌱.
🎯 Stocks to Buy (Harris Victory):
• AES, NEE, TAN: As champions of renewable energy, these stocks will see massive growth under Harris’ leadership as she continues to push for clean energy investments.
• AES has already surged 25% YTD, and analysts predict another 10-15% upside if her policies are fully implemented.
• NEE and TAN will see sustained growth as government-backed renewable energy initiatives take the spotlight.
• HCA (HCA Healthcare) and CNC (Centene Corporation): With Harris’ emphasis on expanding healthcare access and supporting social programs, these two healthcare giants will thrive.
• RIVN (Rivian Automotive): Harris’ pro-environment stance means EV manufacturers like Rivian will get a boost through increased government support for electric vehicles.
🏛️ Trump Victory: Old-School Policies and Volatility
If Trump wins, expect a return to the old world of corporate tax cuts, tariffs, and traditional energy dominance. His close ally, Vance, is a reflection of 1950s-era views—ranging from anti-women policies to an economic model that benefits big business over the everyday American.
While this might offer some short-term gains in cyclicals and financials, the overall trajectory of his policies is outdated and unsustainable for modern times.
🎯 Stocks to Buy (Trump Victory):
• DJT, EVR, LAZ, KRE, DFS: These stocks will get a short-term boost from Trump’s deregulation and corporate tax cuts, but at the cost of long-term progress. Financials will surge, but the human cost of these policies is enormous.
🔻 Stocks to Avoid (under Trump):
• NEE, AES, TAN: Clean energy stocks will suffer under Trump’s traditional energy push, further highlighting the backward direction of his policies.
💼 Hedge Fund Strategies: Who’s Betting on What?
Let’s take a look at how the big players are positioning themselves:
Dan Loeb (Third Point):
Loeb’s hedge fund is banking on a Trump win, focusing on cyclicals and financials. His bets align with the traditionalist, corporate-first approach that Trump and Vance represent.
Mark Dowding (RBC BlueBay):
Dowding’s strategy heavily favors interest rates and a stronger U.S. dollar if Trump wins, but these gains will be short-lived as global trade conflicts intensify.
Vineer Bhansali (LongTail Alpha):
Bhansali is betting on market volatility, particularly post-election uncertainty, which he expects to rise under both candidates. However, he sees Harris driving long-term growth in clean energy.
Zachary Kurz (PinnBrook Capital):
Kurz is hedging his bets but acknowledges that financials could see a short-term rally under Trump. Still, he’s cautious, noting the unpredictability of Trump’s policies.
🔮 Harris: The Candidate for Ordinary Americans
Let’s be clear: Harris’ policies are far more beneficial to the average American. From middle-class tax cuts to expanded healthcare and social security, Harris focuses on reducing the cost of living for ordinary people. Meanwhile, Trump’s outdated views, especially when bolstered by Vance’s 1950s rhetoric, simply fail to represent the needs of modern Americans.
Do Their Policies Really Affect Stock Market Performance?
Yes! During Trump’s 2016 win, renewable energy stocks initially dropped, but as the market adjusted, they surged by 383%. Under Harris, expect a far more consistent rise in clean energy, healthcare, and socially responsible sectors. Her policies are progressive, ensuring steady growth rather than short-term bursts.
🧠 Key Question to Tiger Traders
Hey Tiger Traders, with Harris’ focus on clean energy and the middle class, will you be pivoting your portfolio toward these progressive sectors, or are you still hedging with financials?
🧠 Question to TigerGPT
TigerGPT, how do misogynistic policies like those proposed by Trump and Vance affect market sentiment, and what are the long-term risks for sectors dependent on gender diversity and inclusion?
Happy trading ahead. Cheers, BC 🍀
Anyway, I m long term investor. All the best to whoever wins the U.S. elections next month. 🍾🥂🎉🎊
相比之下，哈里斯代表的民主党政策可能更注重社会公平和环保等议题，这在长期上可能是积极的，但短期内可能带来更多税收和监管，这对于投资者来说可能会增加不确定性和风险。特别是她支持的较为激进的气候政策和财富分配改革，可能会对部分行业（如能源、科技等）造成压力，影响股市表现。
从经济角度考虑，我更倾向于特朗普的政策。他在处理经济问题时，更注重通过减税和放松监管来激励企业发展，这有助于推动市场繁荣，创造就业机会并提高投资回报率。对于希望短期内看到经济快速复苏的投资者来说，特朗普的政策似乎更加直接和有效。
总体来说，无论是作为普通公民还是投资者，我都会选择支持特朗普。虽然他在其他方面存在一些争议，但就经济和投资环境而言，他的政策对我来说更为有利。
哈里斯：專注於降低生活成本，特別是在住房和醫療保健方面，但她的住房政策可能會無意中提高通貨膨脹。
特朗普：旨在通過增加石油供應和減少支出來對抗通貨膨脹，儘管他的關稅也可能提高成本。
哈里斯：提議爲中產階級和小企業減稅；可能會提高對富人的稅收，強調兒童和勞動所得稅抵免。
特朗普：主張廣泛減稅，延長減稅和就業法案，可能將公司稅降至15%。