Pelosi Locks in Profits; Lawmaker Exits UNH Early! Are Congressional Trades Good Signals?
A new congressional disclosure has once again reignited debate around tracking lawmakers’ trades.
Nancy Pelosi reported roughly $69 million in recent transactions, highlighted by the sale of about $50 million worth of $Apple(AAPL)$, along with reductions in $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ and $Walt Disney(DIS)$
At the same time, Pelosi added new LEAP call options on $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ , $Amazon.com(AMZN)$, $Apple(AAPL)$, and $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ , using far less capital to retain upside exposure.
The message is subtle but important: this is less about turning bearish on tech and more about locking in gains while maintaining long-term optionality.
In contrast, Congressman Kevin Hern disclosed a complete exit from his roughly $500,000 position in $UnitedHealth(UNH)$, marked as “sell to close.”
Notably, Hern sits on the House health subcommittee. Shortly after, healthcare stocks sold off sharply, with UNH plunging nearly 20% as investors reacted to weaker guidance and looming Medicare reimbursement pressure.
Together, these trades illustrate two very different approaches. Pelosi’s strategy emphasizes capital efficiency and risk management, while Hern’s move signals a full de-risking ahead of policy-driven uncertainty.
For individual investors, the key question remains whether these trades are actionable signals—or simply reflections of access and tools most retail traders don’t have.
-
How do you interpret Pelosi’s recent trade?
-
Is there any takeaway for retail investors?
-
Should retail investors “follow” congressional trades?
-
After UNH’s sharp sell-off, where is a good dip-buy level?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins~
For SG users only, Welcome to open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs.
Find out more here.
Complete your first Cash Boost Account trade with a trade amount of ≥ SGD1000* to get SGD 688 stock vouchers*! The trade can be executed using any payment type available under the Cash Boost Account: Cash, CPF, SRS, or CDP.
Other helpful links:
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
2. The key takeaway for retail investors is to stay invested in large tech $Microsoft(MSFT)$
3. Retail investors should follow the index $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ instead of other traders
4. $UnitedHealth(UNH)$ has a highly uncertain business model at this time and is not investible
For retail investors, the lesson isn’t to copy congressional trades, but to understand the thinking behind them. Most retail traders can’t size or structure trades the same way, so blindly following disclosures rarely works. What does help is learning when to take profits and how to maintain exposure without overcommitting capital.
$UnitedHealth(UNH)$ is a different story. After the sharp sell-off, I wouldn’t rush to buy the dip. I’d wait for the stock to stabilize around longer-term support and for policy risks to be better priced in. In healthcare names, patience usually beats trying to be early.
@Tiger_SG @TigerStars @Tiger_comments @TigerClub
總之，這些交易說明了兩種截然不同的方法。佩洛西的策略強調資本效率及風險管理，而赫恩的舉動表明在政策驅動的不確定性之前全面去風險.
對於個人投資者來說，關鍵問題仍然是這些交易是否是可操作的信號，或者只是大多數散戶交易者不具備的渠道和工具的反映。
與此同時，佩洛西新增飛躍看漲期權選項在$Alphabet（GOOGL）$,$亞馬遜(AMZN)$,$蘋果(AAPL)$，和$英偉達(NVDA)$，使用少得多的資本來保持上行風險。