Pelosi Locks in Profits; Lawmaker Exits UNH Early! Are Congressional Trades Good Signals?

A new congressional disclosure has once again reignited debate around tracking lawmakers’ trades.

Nancy Pelosi reported roughly $69 million in recent transactions, highlighted by the sale of about $50 million worth of $Apple(AAPL)$, along with reductions in $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ and $Walt Disney(DIS)$

At the same time, Pelosi added new LEAP call options on $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ , $Amazon.com(AMZN)$, $Apple(AAPL)$, and $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ , using far less capital to retain upside exposure.

The message is subtle but important: this is less about turning bearish on tech and more about locking in gains while maintaining long-term optionality.

In contrast, Congressman Kevin Hern disclosed a complete exit from his roughly $500,000 position in $UnitedHealth(UNH)$, marked as “sell to close.”

Notably, Hern sits on the House health subcommittee. Shortly after, healthcare stocks sold off sharply, with UNH plunging nearly 20% as investors reacted to weaker guidance and looming Medicare reimbursement pressure.

Together, these trades illustrate two very different approaches. Pelosi’s strategy emphasizes capital efficiency and risk management, while Hern’s move signals a full de-risking ahead of policy-driven uncertainty.

For individual investors, the key question remains whether these trades are actionable signals—or simply reflections of access and tools most retail traders don’t have.

  1. How do you interpret Pelosi’s recent trade?

  2. Is there any takeaway for retail investors?

  3. Should retail investors “follow” congressional trades?

  4. After UNH’s sharp sell-off, where is a good dip-buy level?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~


For SG users only, Welcome to open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs.

Find out more here.

Complete your first Cash Boost Account trade with a trade amount of ≥ SGD1000* to get SGD 688 stock vouchers*! The trade can be executed using any payment type available under the Cash Boost Account: Cash, CPF, SRS, or CDP.

Click to access the activity

Other helpful links:

# Lawmaker Exits UNH Early! Are Congressional Trades Good Signals?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment26

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Shyon
    ·01-28
    TOP
    I read Pelosi’s trade as risk management, not a tech bearish call. Trimming $Apple(AAPL)$ and $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ after a strong run while rolling exposure into LEAP calls is a smart way to lock in gains and stay positioned for long-term upside with less capital at risk. It’s about efficiency and optionality, not exiting tech.

    For retail investors, the lesson isn’t to copy congressional trades, but to understand the thinking behind them. Most retail traders can’t size or structure trades the same way, so blindly following disclosures rarely works. What does help is learning when to take profits and how to maintain exposure without overcommitting capital.

    $UnitedHealth(UNH)$ is a different story. After the sharp sell-off, I wouldn’t rush to buy the dip. I’d wait for the stock to stabilize around longer-term support and for policy risks to be better priced in. In healthcare names, patience usually beats trying to be early.

    @Tiger_SG @TigerStars @Tiger_comments @TigerClub

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • 1PC
    ·01-28
    TOP
    They are still human & might be following their own trade plans like rebalancing their portfolio, hence I won't follow them, regardless if they are congressmen or gurus [Chuckle]..I follow the charts 📈🚀 📉 😜 @JC888 @Barcode @Shyon @Aqa @koolgal @Shernice軒嬣 2000 @Aqa @DiAngel
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Shyon
      [Cool] [Cool] [Cool]
      01-28
      Reply
      Report
  • JC888
    ·01-29
    Policy makers and politicians trading should be framed in such a way that it shld be submitted in advanced by x-time frame, before it is allowed.
    This clears or minimises abuse of information.
    Then again with a Headso muddled, it's a cowboy country really.
    So it helps to track and mimick their patterns.
    Even the classic movie Sabrina and it's subsequent remake says so too.
    Reply
    Report
  • koolgal
    ·01-29
    🌟🌟🌟Should Retail Investors Follow Congressional Trades?  I would say No.  Firstly there is a mandatory delay under the STOCK Act of up to 45 days after the trade has been done.  This means that retail investors are often acting in information that is weeks old.  The market may have already reacted or conditions may have changed.

    Members of Congress also often have access to financial tools & potentially non public information or unique insights not available to the average investor.

    More importantly their trades might be influenced by their personal circumstances which are not relevant to an individual investor's goals.

    @Tiger_SG @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub @CaptainTiger

    Reply
    Report
  • BTS
    ·01-31 02:45
    Congressional stock trades often attract attention, notably when high-profile lawmakers, like Nancy Pelosi, adjust holdings ahead of volatility; the recent exit from UnitedHealth Group (UNH) reignited debate if such trades signal market trends or reflect opportunistic timing

    Due to delayed disclosures, congressional trades often lack full context, including hedges, options, or portfolio shifts; a sale could signal profit-taking or reallocation rather than a bearish stance

    Recent UNH sale preceded a sharp sell-off, driven by weak guidance, regulatory pressure, and Medicare Advantage issues, pushing stock down。。。

    UNH trades at lower valuations than usual, with some analysts seeing it as discounted due to long-term cash flow, though ongoing policy challenges and regulatory risks warrant caution

    For retail investors, congressional trades inspire research, but the real edge lies in disciplined strategy; blindly copying trades raises timing risk, especially with volatile stocks like UNH

    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-30
    总结一句话:国会交易更像是一面镜子,照出风险偏好和资金策略,而不是直接给出买卖答案。散户真正要做的,是把这些信息转化成对自己仓位管理的提醒。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-30
    相比之下,赫恩清仓 UNH 的信号更“干脆”。作为健康小组委员会成员,他面对的是政策不确定性快速上升的现实。UNH 暴跌近 20% 后,短期情绪已被充分释放,但这类政策压力并非一两周就能消化。我更倾向于等待进一步下探、估值明显低于历史中枢后,再考虑分批介入,而不是急着抄底。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-30
    至于是否应该跟随国会交易,我的答案偏保守:可以观察,但不宜照抄。他们的披露往往滞后,工具和信息优势也不是散户能复制的。更重要的是,很多操作是基于个人资产结构,而不是单纯看好或看空。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-30
    散户能学到什么?我认为重点不在“买哪只”,而在“怎么持有”。当估值偏高、波动加大的时候,降低现货仓位、控制回撤,比继续加杠杆更重要。即便不用期权,也可以通过分批止盈、提高现金比例来达到类似效果。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-30
    这次披露如果只看“买卖名单”,很容易得出错误结论。佩洛西并不是简单地看空科技股,而是在高位做结构性降风险。她大幅卖出苹果、降低英伟达和迪士尼的现货仓位,同时用更少资金去买入 GOOGL、AMZN、AAPL、NVDA 的看涨期权,本质是在锁定账面利润的同时,保留长期上行弹性。这传递的信号很清晰:对科技长期趋势仍有信心,但不愿意再用重资本承受短期波动。这不是方向判断,而是资金效率和风险管理的选择。
    Reply
    Report
  • icycrystal
    ·01-29
    Recent filings from late December 2025 and mid-January 2026 show that the Pelosi family's portfolio managers are actively re-allocating assets by selling a large portion of established tech and media holdings while buying into other mega-cap tech stocks and a utility company.

    Pelosi's portfolio has historically outperformed the S&P 500, often leading to a "Pelosi effect" where stocks jump after her trades are disclosed. However, disclosures are only required within 45 days of a trade, meaning retail investors are often weeks behind the actual transaction date which not a guaranteed path to success. It is critical to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions.

    UnitedHealth Group (UNH) recently experienced a sharp sell-off probably due to concerns over high medical costs and a weaker-than-expected Medicare Advantage rate notice.

    Reply
    Report
  • L.Lim
    ·01-29
    If you could know their trades as they make it, then it would be good to follow, because it is obvious they are trading with information that only they have by being political big wigs. However all these declarations come out with some, and can only hint at certain trends, and therefore would be context to consider when making decisions.
    With regards to UNH, if more disclosures show these politicians disposing, then it would be conclusive evidence that the healthcare insurer is undergoing repricing where the current price would become the norm.
    Reply
    Report
  • 1.This is a nuanced, institutional-grade repositioning. It reduces direct stock market volatility exposure, maintains leveraged upside potential in core tech holdings via options, and diversifies into income-generating and thematic "next-phase" Al investments.
    2.These strategies involve options, tax planning, and significant capital-elements that may be out of reach for many individual investors.
    3.A more prudent approach is to understand the logic and themes behind the trades (e.g., "Al infrastructure beyond chips," "portfolio income balancing") and evaluate if those themes align with your own research and investment thesis.
    Reply
    Report
  • koolgal
    ·01-29
    🌟🌟🌟Nancy Pelosi's recent trading activity which includes large sales of Apple, Nvidia & Disney & subsequent purchases of LEAP call options in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple & Nvidia, is best interpreted as a sophisticated risk management & capital efficiency strategy, rather than a purely bearish signal.

    Important lessons that I can learn from her trading actions are:

    Understand Risk Management: This highlights the value of taking profits after strong performance & managing concentration risk.

    I can apply this by regularly rebalancing my portfolio, setting stop losses & not being overly concentrated in a few high performing stocks.

    Focus on Long Term Goals: Pelosi's LEAPs have a long timeframe of Jan 27.  This indicates a long term belief in the fundamental growth of these companies despite short term caution.

    This teaches me to maintain focus on my long term diversified asset allocation, rather than chasing every stock tip.

    @Tiger_SG @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub

    Reply
    Report
  • Chrishust
    ·01-29
    1. Pelosi’s recent trade is to maintain a long position in big tech $Alphabet(GOOGL)$
    2. The key takeaway for retail investors is to stay invested in large tech $Microsoft(MSFT)$
    3. Retail investors should follow the index $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ instead of other traders
    4. $UnitedHealth(UNH)$ has a highly uncertain business model at this time and is not investible
    Reply
    Report
  • Cadi Poon
    ·01-28
    值得注意的是,赫恩是衆議院健康小組委員會的成員。不久之後,醫療保健股大幅拋售,UNH暴跌近20%隨着投資者對較弱的指導和迫在眉睫的醫療保險報銷壓力做出反應。

    總之,這些交易說明了兩種截然不同的方法。佩洛西的策略強調資本效率及風險管理,而赫恩的舉動表明在政策驅動的不確定性之前全面去風險.

    對於個人投資者來說,關鍵問題仍然是這些交易是否是可操作的信號,或者只是大多數散戶交易者不具備的渠道和工具的反映。

    Reply
    Report
  • TimothyX
    ·01-28
    南希·佩洛西粗略報道6900萬美元在最近的交易中,突出的是出售了約價值5000萬美元$蘋果(AAPL)$,以及減少$英偉達(NVDA)$和$華特迪士尼(DIS)$

    與此同時,佩洛西新增飛躍看漲期權選項在$Alphabet(GOOGL)$,$亞馬遜(AMZN)$,$蘋果(AAPL)$,和$英偉達(NVDA)$,使用少得多的資本來保持上行風險。

    Reply
    Report
  • ECLC
    ·01-29
    Much to learn on strategy used but  retail traders have no deep pockets   and too risky to "follow after" congressional trades.
    Reply
    Report
  • highhand
    ·01-28
    Yes, they are the best signals. but signal come too late. They are like rats that can smell cheese left overnight on the kitchen table. Sneaky little b*s*a*ds
    Reply
    Report
  • insider trading?? Law maker usually knows what is going to happen.... basically benefiting themselves...
    what a.......
    Reply
    Report