SpaceX Countdown: The Biggest IPO in History! $135 Per Share, Worth It?
The countdown is on. As soon as next week (the market broadly expects around June 12), $Space Exploration Technologies Corp(SPCX)$ lists on the Nasdaq under the ticker $SPCX$. Priced at $135 per share, a $1.77 trillion valuation, raising $74.4 billion — instantly the largest IPO in history. Musk skipped the usual price range and simply named a number. If the stock pops in its first days, he could become the world's first trillionaire.
Just how big is this IPO?
- $135 a share, $1.77T valuation, $74.4B raised (ceiling up to $86B). That raise nearly exceeds the total of every US IPO of the past two years combined
- More than 40% above the company's own $1.25T self-valuation in February
- SpaceX rewrites prior record was Saudi Aramco in 2019: $1.7T valuation, raising over $29B.
- Musk controls ~50% economic stake (~$752B) plus over 85% of voting power (super-voting shares); he can't sell until certain operational targets are met
It's also a bellwether: Anthropic filed confidentially on Monday, OpenAI is expected within weeks, both valued near $1T. Three mega-listings could open the floodgates of wealth across Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
Why $1.77 trillion? Goldman is betting on AI growing 100x
Lead underwriter Goldman shared an aggressive model verbally with asset managers on the roadshow:
- AI revenue: $3.2B in 2025 → $322B in 2030, roughly 100x
- Total revenue: $18.7B last year (+33% YoY) → $474B in 2030
- AI ramp: +388% YoY to $15.6B in 2026, $34.5B in 2027
- Starlink at $144B in 2030, less than half of AI; launch business $4.1B → $8.3B
- EBITDA: $6.6B in 2025 → $352B in 2030; free cash flow expected to turn positive at $72B by 2031
The whole story rests on one assumption: xAI's total addressable market is a staggering $26.5T, far above the ~$2T combined for Starlink and space. In other words, this $1.77T isn't buying rockets — it's buying AI.
But it's a colossal cash-burn story
- Net loss of over $4.9B last year (a $791M profit in 2024), with the loss widening entirely on AI spending
- xAI lost $6.4B in 2025; Grok still trails Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google in code, security, agents, and conversational models, and paid subscriptions are nowhere near what the revenue needs
- The 300MW Colossus 1 supercomputer in Memphis runs underutilized as Grok monetization disappoints — Musk simply rented the compute to rival Anthropic
- Within two years of founding, Musk pushed out all 10 co-founders
- The cash burn is enormous: possibly $120B over this year and next, another $230B through 2030, ~$350B cumulatively over five years; free cash flow ran a $13.8B deficit last year
The optimists say it's claiming the next-gen AI gateway — AI data centers in orbit, a lunar factory, and ultimately humans on Mars. The cautious say it's a colossal cash-burn story that must be proven with real profit.
Discussion
Will you get on board next week?
The biggest IPO in history lists next week — will you buy $SPCX$ at the offering, or wait a few quarters of earnings first?
Goldman bets AI revenue grows 100x in five years, yet xAI is still deep in the red and Grok is behind — do you believe the story, or is it a valuation bubble?
Musk could become the world's first trillionaire on this — a faith premium worth paying, or risk that isn't priced in?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins~
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
The main concern for me is heavy cash burn and uncertain monetization timing, especially around xAI and AI expansion. Even if the total addressable market is huge, competition from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google makes execution uncertain. With free cash flow still negative, the risk-reward at IPO pricing feels stretched.
Personally, I would not chase the IPO on listing day. I’d prefer to wait for post-IPO volatility or clearer evidence of sustainable profitability. I’m not dismissing the long-term story, but at this level I see it as a high-risk narrative trade rather than a disciplined entry point.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_SG
- EBITDA: $6.6B in 2025 → $352B in 2030; free cash flow expected to turn positive at $72B by 2031
- Total revenue: $18.7B last year (+33% YoY) → $474B in 2030
- AI ramp: +388% YoY to $15.6B in 2026, $34.5B in 2027
SpaceX isn't selling rockets. It is selling access to the next era of mankind - the era where Earth is not our only address.
At USD 135 per share - whether it is expensive or cheap depends on what you believe.
If you think SpaceX is just another aerospace company then yes USD 135 seems high.
But if you believe SpaceX is the backbone of global satellite internet (Starlink), the world's dominant launch provider, the only company capable of building a multi planetary civilisation, the infrastructure layer for the next century -
then USD 135 feels like less of a price & more like an invitation to participate in a story that will be told for generations.
You buy because you have watched SpaceX defy gravity literally & financially for 20 years.
You buy because you believe in the future of SpaceX.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_SG
The $SPCX$ IPO is getting a lot of attention, and I can see why. It's the biggest IPO ever, and anything involving Elon Musk tends to get people excited.
As a fairly average investor, I'm interested, but I'm not rushing in on day one.
What stands out to me is that a lot of the valuation seems to be based on future AI growth rather than the space business itself. If that growth happens, it could be a great investment. If it doesn't, the valuation looks pretty hard to justify.
For now, I'd rather watch a few earnings reports and see how the AI side of the business develops before deciding whether to invest.
I've learnt the hard way that buying into hype without doing enough research doesn't always end well, so I'm trying to be a bit more patient these days.
My view: Great company, interesting future, but I'll be watching from the sidelines before jumping in.
What about you Tigers? Are you buying $SPCX$ at IPO or waiting to see some results fir
Instead, it seems that people are exiting their positions in Crypto and AI ( $Micron Technology(MU)$ , NBIS, NVDA,etc.) to rotate into Space themed companies.
I am taking the chance to add to companies like Micron and Alphabet during this dip, before the SpaceX profiteers start rushing back in.
I believe Elon is a visionary and true technopreneur, but it's a brutal world when politics and money come together.
SpaceX has real businesses: launch services, defence contracts, and Starlink. Unlike many hyped IPOs, it already generates substantial revenue. The question isn't whether it's a great company, but whether the valuation already assumes years of perfect execution.
The xAI angle is where I'm more cautious. AI revenue growing 100x sounds exciting, but Grok remains behind leading models, and profitability is still distant. Investors may be paying today for cash flows that are many years away.
My approach: if the IPO opens at a reasonable premium, I'd consider a starter position. If it surges 50-100% on day one, I'd rather wait for earnings and lock-up expiries.
SpaceX could eventually justify a massive valuation, but even exceptional companies can be poor investments if bought at an excessive price. The company is easier to believe in than the initial valuation. 🚀📈